Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: AMD CONVERTING & LABEL, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AMD CONVERTING & LABEL, INC. in 2327 PEWAUKEE RD, WAUKESHA, WI 53188 (NAICS 323119). OSHA activity number 341890366.

Watch AMD Converting & Label, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for AMD Converting & Label, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2327 PEWAUKEE RD
City
WAUKESHA
State
WI
ZIP
53188
Mailing
2327 PEWAUKEE RD, WAUKESHA, WI 53188
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
323119
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1630.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:    (a) The employer did not ensure that a PPE hazard assessment was conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1630

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $3613.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    (a) The employer did not ensure that a hazardous energy control program was implemented when employees were conducting service and maintenance on equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3612.85
  • — Z (S) $3803

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:  (a) The employer did not ensure that employees received training in the control of hazardous energy.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:      (a) On the Mark Andy 910 machine, procedures for the control of hazardous energy were not established.    (b) On the Mark Andy 4120 machine, procedures for the control of hazardous energy were not established.     (c) On the Wesco W-56 laminator machine, procedures for the control of hazardous energy were not established.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3803

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2173.00 · Current $2064.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    (a) The employer did not ensure that persons who operate powered industrial trucks completed training and evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2064.35
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $3613.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as , but not limited to, those created by moving components, ingoing nip points, and rotating parts:       (a) On the Mark Andy 830 machine, the employer did not ensure that rotating components were guarded, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.     (b) On the All-Ex single knife slitter, the employer did not ensure that adequate guarding was implemented, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.     (c) On the Wesco W-56 laminator machine, the employer did not ensure that adequate guarding was implemented, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.     (d) On the Mark Andy 4120 machine, the employer did not ensure that adequate guarding was implemented around moving components, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3612.85
  • — Z (S) $3803

1910.212 A03 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  (a) On the Gane Brothers & Lane, Inc. shear machine, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was implemented, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3803

1910.22 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.22(b)(1): Where mechanical handling equipment was used, sufficient safe clearances were not allowed for aisles, at loading docks, through doorways and wherever turns or passage had to be made:  (a) The employer did not ensure that aisle ways were marked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.303 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:  (a) On the laminator machine, a control panel did not have all the covers installed to enclose all electrical components.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341890366.