NEWTON, AL —
OSHA Inspection: BILL SMITH
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BILL SMITH in 13350 WEST US 84, NEWTON, AL 36352 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 341897056.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BILL SMITH
- Site address
- 13350 WEST US 84
- City
- NEWTON
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36352
- Mailing
- 204 WINDYHILL RD, TAYLOR, AL 36301
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238120
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were allowed to operate a powered industrial truck without wearing a seatbelt: a) At 13350 West US 84, Newton, Alabama: On or about November 8, 2016 sand at times prior; the employer exposed his employees to crush hazards in that he allowed his employees to operate a powered industrial truck (Lull) without wearing a seatbelt.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2138
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,672 · Current $2,672
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a) At 13350 West US 84, Newton, Alabama: On or about November 8, 2016 and at times prior; the employer exposed his employees to struck-by hazards in that employees were allowed to operate a powered industrial truck without the employer first ensuring the employees were competent to operate equipment as demonstrated by the completion on the required training and evaluation specified in the regulation.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2672
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were being placed in services after the examination showed condition(s) adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle: a) 13350 West US 84, Newton, Alabama: On or about November 8, 2016 and at times prior; the employer exposed his employees to struck-by hazards in that employees were allowed to operate a Lull without a working horn.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2138
1926.451 G04 IV
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(iv): Midrails were not installed at a height approximately midway between the top edge of the guardrail system and the platform surface: a) At 13350 West Hwy 84, Newton, Alabama: On or about November 8, 2016 and at times prior; the employer exposed his employees to a fall hazard of 25 feet to the ground below in that he failed to ensure a midrail was installed around a work platform employees were working from that was being lifted by a Lull.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.602 C01 VIII A
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(viii)(A): The safety platform was not firmly secured to the lifting carriage and/or forks: a) At 13350 West US 84, Newton, Alabama: On or about November 8, 2016 and at time prior; the employer allowed his employees to use a job made platform resting on the forks of the Lull and the platform was not secured to the Lull exposing the employer to a fall hazard of up to 30 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.760 A01
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.760(a)(1): Each employee engaged in a steel erection activity who is on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge more than 15 feet (4.6 m) above a lower level was not protected from fall hazards by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems, or fall restraint systems: a) At 13350 West Hwy 84, Newton, Alabama: On or about November 8, 2016 and at times prior; the employer exposed his employees to a fall hazard of up to 30 feet to the ground below in that he allowed his employees to perform roofing activities without any type of fall protection. b) At 13350 West Hwy 84, Newton, Alabama: On or about November 8, 2016 and at times prior; the employer exposed his employees to a fall hazard of up to 28 feet to the ground below in that he allowed his employees to install gutters without any type of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.761 B
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.761(b): The employer did not train each employee exposed to a fall hazard in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1926.761: a) At 13350 West Hwy 84, Newton, Alabama: On or about November 8, 2016 and at times prior; the employer exposed his employees to a fall hazard of up to 30 feet to the ground below in that he allowed his employees to perform roofing activities without first training his employees on fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3741
More inspections at Bill Smith
View Bill Smith's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238120)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341897056.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.