Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PREMIER PACKAGING PRODUCTS, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of PREMIER PACKAGING PRODUCTS, INC. in 9142 TECHNOLOGY DR, COVINGTON, GA 30014 (NAICS 322211). OSHA activity number 341920593.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Premier Packaging Products, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Premier Packaging Products, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9142 TECHNOLOGY DR
City
COVINGTON
State
GA
ZIP
30014
Mailing
9142 TECHNOLOGY DR, COVINGTON, GA 30014
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
322211
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 30, 2016
Abate by
Jan 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,988 · Current $3,822 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to items of this section.    On 10/26/16, at the Covington facility, the employer did not ensure LOTO procedures were specific in that procedures had the following deficiencies:    a - Magnitude of energy  b - Identification of all energies on the machine  c - Group Lockout procedures  d - Lock removal  e - Shift Change
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3822
  • — Z (S) $4988

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section.  On approximately 10/19/16, the employer did not ensure employees utilized established LOTO procedures when performing "Authorized" work on production equipment, including the Cut Off Saw.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,545 · Current $1,182 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure.    On 10/26/16, at the Covington job site, the employer did not implement a Lockout/Tagout Training program for Affected employees at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1182
  • — Z (S) $1545

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 30, 2016
Abate by
Dec 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,988 · Current $3,822 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The  point of operation of machines whose operation exposed an employee to injury, was not guarded.    On 10/19/16, in the production area, the employer did not ensure the point of operation was guarded on machines including:    a - Partition Sample machine  b - Jurine Sample machine
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3822
  • — Z (S) $4988

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.    On 10/19/16, in the production area, the employer did not ensure the foot treadle was guarded on machines that would trigger operations in the machines including:    a - Partition Sample machine  b - Jurine Sample machine
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Nov 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,545 · Current $1,182 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident.    On 10/26/16, at the Covington facility, the employer did not mark electrical disconnects and equipment so as to indicate what the equipment controls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1182
  • — Z (S) $1545

1904.40 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 30, 2016
Abate by
Dec 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $340 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative the records within the four business hours.    On 10/26/16, at the Covington office, the employer could not provide OSHA 300 logs for inspection and review.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $340

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341920593.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.