MANCHESTER, CT —
OSHA Inspection: FOUNTAIN VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FOUNTAIN VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, LLC in 175 DOWNEY DRIVE, MANCHESTER, CT 06040 (NAICS 531110). OSHA activity number 342003050.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FOUNTAIN VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, LLC
- Site address
- 175 DOWNEY DRIVE
- City
- MANCHESTER
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06040
- Mailing
- 175A DOWNEY DRIVE, MANCHESTER, CT 06040
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 531110
- Employees
- 14
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3622.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards: Company: On, or about, January 3, 2017, employees who worked in the elevated work platform of the JLG Model 400S self-propelled aerial lift were not provided with and did not wear appropriate personal fall restraint or fall arrest equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3622
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2897.00 · Current $1750.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: Company: On, or about January 3, 2017, the company had not developed and implemented a lockout/tagout program that consisted of specific lockout procedures, properly lockout hardware and employee training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1750
- — Z (S) $2897
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2173.00 · Current $1250.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Company: On, or about, January 3, 2017, the company had not developed and implemented a Hazard Communication Program that included training regarding the Hazard Communication Standard, proper container labeling, Safety Data Sheets, the safe use and handling of chemicals used at the worksite and training regarding pictograms for container labels and Safety Data Sheets.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250
- — Z (S) $2173
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3622.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Building 121: On, or about, October 1, 2016, employees performing a repair to a roof valley of Building 121 without the use of fall protection equipment. Employees were exposed to a fall distance of approximately 16 feet at the front of the building and 24 feet at the rear of the building.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3622
1910.146 C02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces: Pumping Station: On, or about, January 3, 2017, a confined space sign or other posting had not been provided near the entrance to the underground tank and submerged pump equipment provided for the sewage pumping station.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 531110)
SACRAMENTO, CA—2026-07-13
APARTMENT MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS
LEXINGTON, KY—2026-07-08
69304 - COASTAL RIDGE MANAGEMENT LLC
SACRAMENTO, CA—2026-07-07
O & A PROPERTIES LLC
DELANO, CA—2026-06-25
PARK PLACE APARTMENTS
RICHLAND, WA—2026-06-24
WA317991779 - CRAIG MCLAUGHLIN FAMILY TRUST
More inspections in CT
BRIDGEPORT, CT—2026-07-10
WRR, INC.
BERLIN, CT—2026-07-10
MMF CONSTRUCTION LLC
NAUGATUCK, CT—2026-07-08
WHITING-TURNER LCT2 JOINT VENTURE
SOMERS, CT—2026-07-08
F&G RECYCLING LLC
STAMFORD, CT—2026-07-07
FAIRFIELD AVENUE MAINTENANCE COMPANY, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342003050.