1,224,460Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-16
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: FLUIDRA USA, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FLUIDRA USA, LLC in 8525 MALLORY ROAD, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32220 (NAICS 333318). OSHA activity number 342341815.

Watch Fluidra USA, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fluidra USA, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FLUIDRA USA, LLC
Site address
8525 MALLORY ROAD
City
JACKSONVILLE
State
FL
ZIP
32220
Mailing
8525 MALLORY ROAD, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32220
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333318
Employees
33
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3232.00 · Current $1939.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a. On or about May 23, 2017, lamination, assembly, prep and chop employees were required to wear NIOSH approved full-face and half-face respirators during the manufacturer of fiberglass tanks and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program that addressed the worksite-specific procedures such as but not limited to employee medical evaluations, fit testing, and training on the use, maintenance and care of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1939.2
  • — Z (S) $3232

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a.  On or about May 23, 2017, lamination, assembly, prep and chop employees were required to wear NIOSH approved full-face and half-face respirators during the manufacturer of fiberglass tanks and had not been provided with medical evaluations prior to wearing the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a.  On or about May 23, 2017, lamination, assembly, prep and chop employees were required to wear NIOSH approved full-face and half-face respirators during the manufacturer of fiberglass tanks and had not been fit tested prior to initial use of the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:  a.  On or about May 23, 2017, lamination and chop employees were required to wear NIOSH approved full-face and half-face respirators during the manufacturer of fiberglass tanks and had not received respirator training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces:  a.  On or about May 22, 2017, lamination employees entered permit-required confined spaces when laminating the interior of fiberglass tanks and the employer did not evaluate or identify permit-required confined spaces in the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1026 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):  a.  On or about May 23, 2017, the employer did not perform initial exposure monitoring for chromium (VI) for an employee who welded on stainless steel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  a.  On or about May 23, 2017, the employer did not include in the hazard communication program an explanation of the labeling system, safety data sheet, and training to all employees who have exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to acetone and styrene.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View FLUIDRA USA, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342341815.