ROBINSON, IL —
OSHA Inspection: CHRIS KRAUSE DBA CK CONSTRUCTION
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CHRIS KRAUSE DBA CK CONSTRUCTION in 1601 JOHNSON ST, ROBINSON, IL 62454 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342613049.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CHRIS KRAUSE DBA CK CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 1601 JOHNSON ST
- City
- ROBINSON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62454
- Mailing
- 9243 EAST 1050TH AVE, ROBINSON, IL 62454
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 25, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,521 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Eye protective equipment was not used when employees were exposed to eye injury while using pneumatic nail guns & circular saws.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1521.1
- — Z (S) $2173
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 25, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,259 · Current $2,281 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: The employer did not ensure fall protection was implemented during residential construction operations when workers were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately nine (9) feet off the roof eve when they were installing roof shingles.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2281.3
- — Z (S) $3259
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342613049.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.