Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DRUM PARTS, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DRUM PARTS, INC. in 7580 GARFIELD BLVD., GARFIELD HEIGHTS, OH 44125 (NAICS 332116). OSHA activity number 342761699.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Drum Parts, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Drum Parts, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DRUM PARTS, INC.
Site address
7580 GARFIELD BLVD.
City
GARFIELD HEIGHTS
State
OH
ZIP
44125
Mailing
7580 GARFIELD BLVD., GARFIELD HEIGHTS, OH 44125
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332116
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment:    On or about November 13, 2017, the employer failed to ensure employees who work with lubricants and corrosives which require different types of hand and eye protection were trained on which type to wear and when they were required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:  On or about November 13, 2017, the employer did not require employees who work with lubricants and corrosives to wear chemical resistant gloves.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    On or about October 26, 2017, the employer failed to ensure a written lockout tagout program was implemented to protect employees that perform lockout on equipment to include, but not limited to, spot welders 1, 2 and 3 when changing dies on the spot welders 2-3 times daily.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.157 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:    On or about November 3, 2017, the employer failed to ensure employees were trained on fire extinguishers. Employees were told to evacuate in the event of a fire, but not trained on the provisions of the plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):    On or about November 3, 2017, the employer failed to have a written Hazard Communication Program for employees that work with, but not limited to, lubricants and corrosives.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about November 3, 2017, the employer did not provide information and training to employees on the hazards of chemicals they are working with such as, but not limited to, lubricants and corrosives.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  On or about November 3, 2017, the employer failed to provide training or information to employees working with hazardous chemicals on the details of the new hazard communication standard which encompasses the Global Harmonization System (GHS).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  On or about November 3, 2017, the employer certify, in writing, that a personal protective equipment hazard assessment was performed. Employees work with lubricants and corrosives which require different types of hand and eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  On or about November 3, 2017, the employer failed to ensure employees that operate propane powered industrial vehicles were trained every three (3) years. Employees were last trained in 2008.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Drum Parts, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342761699.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.