GARFIELD HEIGHTS, OH —
OSHA Inspection: DRUM PARTS, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DRUM PARTS, INC. in 7580 GARFIELD BLVD., GARFIELD HEIGHTS, OH 44125 (NAICS 332116). OSHA activity number 342761699.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DRUM PARTS, INC.
- Site address
- 7580 GARFIELD BLVD.
- City
- GARFIELD HEIGHTS
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44125
- Mailing
- 7580 GARFIELD BLVD., GARFIELD HEIGHTS, OH 44125
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332116
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,956 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment: On or about November 13, 2017, the employer failed to ensure employees who work with lubricants and corrosives which require different types of hand and eye protection were trained on which type to wear and when they were required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2956
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes: On or about November 13, 2017, the employer did not require employees who work with lubricants and corrosives to wear chemical resistant gloves.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: On or about October 26, 2017, the employer failed to ensure a written lockout tagout program was implemented to protect employees that perform lockout on equipment to include, but not limited to, spot welders 1, 2 and 3 when changing dies on the spot welders 2-3 times daily.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $5174
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting: On or about November 3, 2017, the employer failed to ensure employees were trained on fire extinguishers. Employees were told to evacuate in the event of a fire, but not trained on the provisions of the plan.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2217
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,956 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): On or about November 3, 2017, the employer failed to have a written Hazard Communication Program for employees that work with, but not limited to, lubricants and corrosives.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2956
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about November 3, 2017, the employer did not provide information and training to employees on the hazards of chemicals they are working with such as, but not limited to, lubricants and corrosives.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: On or about November 3, 2017, the employer failed to provide training or information to employees working with hazardous chemicals on the details of the new hazard communication standard which encompasses the Global Harmonization System (GHS).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: On or about November 3, 2017, the employer certify, in writing, that a personal protective equipment hazard assessment was performed. Employees work with lubricants and corrosives which require different types of hand and eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: On or about November 3, 2017, the employer failed to ensure employees that operate propane powered industrial vehicles were trained every three (3) years. Employees were last trained in 2008.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Drum Parts, INC.
View Drum Parts, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332116)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342761699.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.