OSHA Inspection: BEST LIGHTING PRODUCTS

Issued

2018-06-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $11641.00 · Current $5821.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(ii): Refresher training in relevant topics shall be provided to the operator when:  29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(ii)(B): The operator has been involved in an accident or near-miss incident;  a. On or before March 27, 2018 where a forklift operator had been involved in an incident on January 25, 2018 that resulted in a recordable injury, the forklift operator did not have refresher training and evaluation conducted after the incident, thereby exposing employees to a struck-by hazards.

Issued

2018-06-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $11641.00 · Current $5821.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance shall be conducted at least once every three years.  a. On or before March 27, 2018, where employees operated powered industrial vehicles, an evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not conducted every three years, thereby exposing employees to struck-by hazards.

Issued

2018-06-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2018-06-26 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1663.00 · Current $832.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): What do I need to do to complete the OSHA 300 Log? You must enter information about your business at the top of the OSHA 300 Log, enter a one or two line description for each recordable injury or illness, and summarize this information on the OSHA 300-A at the end of the year.  For the calendar year 2018 OSHA 300 log, the employer had not included all the information in column F as required for the following entries:   a. Case number 1 did not describe the injury, adequately describe to part of body affected, and did not describe the substance that injured the employee.  b. Case number 2 did not describe the injury, adequately describe to part of body affected, and did not describe the substance that injured the employee.  c. Case number 3 did not describe the substance that injured the employee.  d. Case number 4 did not describe the injury, adequately describe to part of body affected, and did not describe the substance that injured the employee.  e. Case number 5 did not describe the injury, adequately describe to part of body affected, and did not describe the substance that injured the employee.  f. Case number 6 did not describe the injury, adequately describe to part of body affected, and did not describe the substance that injured the employee.