1,224,460Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-16
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: GREATER BRIDGEPORT COMMUNITY ENTERPRISES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GREATER BRIDGEPORT COMMUNITY ENTERPRISES, INC. in 459 IRANISTAN AVE., BRIDGEPORT, CT 06605 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 343048773.

Watch Greater Bridgeport Community Enterprises, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Greater Bridgeport Community Enterprises, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
459 IRANISTAN AVE.
City
BRIDGEPORT
State
CT
ZIP
06605
Mailing
459 IRANISTAN AVE., BRIDGEPORT, CT 06605
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423930
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2956.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use.    Establishment: The employer did not establish and implement a worksite specific written respirator protection program for the employees who were required to wear tightfitting half facepiece dual cartridge respirators while disassembling used mattresses.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $1680
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary.    Establishment: The employer did not provide comprehensive training (necessity, proper fit, usage and maintenance) to the employees who were required to wear tightfitting half facepiece dual cartridge respirators while disassembling used mattresses.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $0
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2956.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.    Establishment: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to wear tightfitting half facepiece dual  cartridge espirators were medically evaluated before wearing respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $1680
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator.    Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to wear tightfitting half facepiece dual cartridge respirators were fit tested prior to wearing the respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $0
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.141 D02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2217.00 · Current $1330.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.141(d)(2)(ii): Lavatories were not provided with hot and cold, or tepid running water.    Establishment: The employer did not ensure employees were provided with hot and cold, or tepid water for washing hands.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1330
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5174.00 · Current $3100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section.    Establishment: The employer had not established and implemented written step-by-step energy control procedures in the machine specific for the employees during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the box-spring sheer machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3100
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees.    Establishment: An employee, as "affected and/or other type" was not provided with training and information in the controlling of potentially hazardous and unexpected releases of energy sources (lockout/tagout) during servicing, maintenance and unjamming of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the box-spring sheer machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3696.00 · Current $2210.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition.    Establishment: The employer did not ensure that the powered industrial forklift truck (PIT) with defective parts and safety features was removed from service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2210
  • — Z (S) $3696

View GREATER BRIDGEPORT COMMUNITY ENTERPRISES, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343048773.