OSHA Inspection: HOME RENOVATION STATION, LLC

Issued

2018-10-31 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1663.00 · Current $1663.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1:  a.  On or about May 4, 2018, the jobsite located at 103 Granger Lane, Panama City Beach, Florida, the employer used a stationary 12-inch double bevel sliding compound miter saw to cut exterior fiber-cement boards without an integrated water delivery system that continuously fed water to the blade.

Issued

2018-10-31 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:  a.  On or about May 4, 2018, the jobsite located at 103 Granger Lane, Panama City Beach, Florida, where the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering and work practice control methods described in Table 1, the employer failed to assess the employees' exposure to respirable crystalline silica.

Issued

2018-10-31 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(e)(1)(ii): Respiratory protection was not provided for tasks not listed in Table 1, or where the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection described in Table 1:  a. On or about May 4, 2018, the jobsite located at 103 Granger Lane, Panama City Beach, Florida, the employer used a stationary 12-inch double bevel sliding compound miter saw to cut exterior fiber-cement board and had not required employees to use respiratory protection. The employer had not fully and properly implemented the engineering and work practice control methods as described in Table 1.

Issued

2018-10-31 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:  a. On or about May 4, 2018, the jobsite located at 103 Granger Lane, Panama City Beach, Florida, the employer used a stationary 12-inch double bevel sliding compound miter saw to cut exterior fiber-cement boards and failed to implement a written exposure control plan.

Issued

2018-10-31 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(1): The employer did not ensure that at least the following hazards were addressed: Cancer, lung effects, immune system effects, and kidney effects:  a. On or about May 4, 2018, the jobsite located at 103 Granger Lane, Panama City Beach, Florida, the employer used a stationary 12-inch double bevel sliding compound miter saw to cut exterior fiber-cement boards and failed to provide training to employees on the health hazards associated with exposure to respirable crystalline silica.