Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BESTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BESTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. in 5710 GREY ROCK DR., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78228 (NAICS 333999). OSHA activity number 343225553.

Watch Bestek Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bestek Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5710 GREY ROCK DR.
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78228
Mailing
5710 GREY ROCK DR., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78228
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333999
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $2328.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):  The employer did not establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performs any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment would be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  a)  South side of the shop.  On or about June 13, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while servicing and maintaining the Fadal hydraulic CNC vertical machining mill, without a lockout-tagout program in place.  b)  Rear of the shop.  On or about June 13, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while servicing and maintaining the Hercules shear, without a lockout-tagout program in place.  c)  Center of the shop.  On or about June 13, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while servicing and maintaining the Accurpress Press Brake , without a lockout-tagout program in place.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2328
  • — Z (S) $3880

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $1663.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, were not guarded:  a)  North side of shop.  On or about June 13, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to caught in- between hazards while operating a Japan Machinery and Metal (JMI) lathe, Model 14524, without proper guarding measures.  b)  South side of shop.  On or about June 13, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to caught in- between hazards while operating a Fadal CNC vertical machining mill, Model No. 906-1, Serial No. 9609407, without proper guarding measures.  c)   North side of shop.  On or about June 13, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to caught in- between hazards while operating a Katukura Turret Lathe, Model 7L-T without proper guarding measures.  d)   Rear of shop.  On or about June 13, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to caught in- between hazards while operating a Hercules shear Model S500-120, A4595, Serial No. 3751206574117, without proper guarding measures.  e)   Center of shop.   On or about June 13, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to caught in- between hazards while operating a Accurpress Press Brake, Model 717512, without proper guarding measures.  f)   Front of shop.  On or about June 13, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to caught in- between hazards while operating a Burr King vertical sander, Model 760. Serial No. 35K818X136, without proper guarding measures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1663.2
  • — Z (S) $2772

1910.215 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $1663.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2):  The safety guard did not cover the spindle end, nut, and flange projections:   Front of shop.  On or about June 13, 2018, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard while deburring metal parts, as the guards on both ends of the bench grinder (no data plate) were missing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1663.2
  • — Z (S) $2772

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):  Safety guards of the types described in Subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this paragraph, where the operator stands in front of the opening, were not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member can be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel. The distance between the wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue or the end of the peripheral member at the top exceeded one-fourth inch:  Front of shop.  On or about June 13, 2018, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard while deburring metal parts, as the distance from the wheel to the tongue of the bench grinder exceeded one-fourth inch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2217.00 · Current $1330.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures and provisions in 29 CFR 11910.134(c)(1)(I) - (ix):  On or about June 13, 2018, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not develop a written respiratory protection program that addressed fit testing, medical evaluations, respirator cleaning and respirator storage for employees that use a respirator while painting parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1330.2
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met:  On or about June 13, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employer did not have a hazard communication program that adequately addressed hazardous properties of chemicals in the workplace, such as, but not limited to xylene, which has acutely hazardous properties, such as flammability, and skin and eye irritant.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View BESTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343225553.