Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: AMBROCIO LARA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AMBROCIO LARA in 9565 CHAMBERWELL, DAPHNE, AL 36526 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343303004.

Watch Ambrocio Lara — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ambrocio Lara is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AMBROCIO LARA
Site address
9565 CHAMBERWELL
City
DAPHNE
State
AL
ZIP
36526
Mailing
22420 ST. PAUL ST., ROBERTSDALE, AL 36567
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $311.00 · Current $311.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a) On or about September 25, 2018; verification of abatement: The employer failed to provide verification of abatement of Citation 1 Item 1; Citation 1, Item 2; Citation 1, Item 3; Citation 1, Item 4a; Citation 1, Item 4b; Citation 1, Item 4c; Citation 2, Item 1; and Citation 2, Item 2 from inspection 1330300 which was issued on August 15, 2018 and had a final contest date of September 11, 2018.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $311

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1663.00 · Current $1663.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a) On or about June 22, 2018 at 9565 Camberwell Dr., Daphne, Al: The employer failed to ensure ground personnel handing up material such as sheets of plywood wore hard hats which exposed them to the hazards associated with being struck in the head by falling material.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1663

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2217.00 · Current $2217.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:  a) On or about June 22, 2018 at 9565 Camberwell Dr., Daphne, Al: The employer failed to ensure an employee properly installed his anchor for fall protection in that the anchor was installed directly to the trusses using the center anchor holes using nails, which the manufacture requires that #14 screws be used going through sheathing and into the truss or 16d nails be used which a minimum of 10 nails go through sheathing and into the truss and the remaining 10 nails go through the sheathing which exposed him to fall hazards.  b) On or about June 22, 2018 at 9565 Camberwell Dr., Daphne, Al: The employer failed to ensure an employee properly installed his anchor for fall protection in that the lanyard was wrapped around a truss and the snap hook was connected to an anchor that was not attached to anything (just hanging in mid air) which exposed him to fall hazards.  c) On or about June 22, 2018 at 9565 Camberwell Dr., Daphne, Al: The employer failed to ensure an employee  maintained proper slack in his lanyard to limit his free fall to six feet or less n that he extended his lanyards length as he walked to the extreme corner of the side roof allowing for approximately 8-10 feet of additional lanyard which exposed him to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2217

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3326.00 · Current $3326.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a) On or about June 22, 2018 at 9565 Camberwell Dr., Daphne, Al: The employer failed to ensure an employee was trained on fall protection and the procedures to follow in order to minimize fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3326

1926.1053 A08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1663.00 · Current $1663.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(a)(8): A metal spreader or locking device was not provided on each stepladder to hold the front and back sections in an open position when the ladder was being used:  a) On or about June 22, 2018 at 9565 Camberwell Dr., Daphne, Al: The employer failed to ensure an employee properly used a 6 foot step ladder when he got down from the floor joist using the 6 foot step ladder which was leaning against an inner wall which exposed him to a fall hazard due to the ladder not being properly set-up with the locking devices properly positioned.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1663

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a) On or about June 22, 2018 at 9565 Camberwell Dr., Daphne, Al: The employer failed to ensure an extension ladder used to gain access to an upper lever extended three feet above the landing area which exposed an employee to fall hazards while getting on/off the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:  a) On or about June 22, 2018 at 9565 Camberwell Dr., Daphne, Al: The employer failed to ensure an employee properly used a 6 foot step ladder when he got down from the floor joist using the top two steps which exposed him to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3326.00 · Current $3326.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  On or about June 22, 2018 at 9565 Camberwell Dr., Daphne, Al: The employer failed to ensure employees installing sheathing while using pneumatic nail guns wore eye protection which exposed them to the hazards associated with being struck-by flying material.  THE AMBROSIO LARA DBA AMBROSIO LARA WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD OR ITS EQUIVALENT STANDARD 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 982396, CITATION NUMBER 1, ITEM NUMBER 1 AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON JULY 17, 2014, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 10737 GAHLIA CT, LOT 28, DAPHNE, ALABAMA.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $3326

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $22173.00 · Current $22173.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a) On or about June 22, 2018 at 9565 Camberwell Dr., Daphne, Al: The employer failed to ensure employees installing sheathing properly installed and used their personnel fall protection in that the anchors were not properly installed and at times they had excessive slack in their lanyards which exposed them to fall hazards.   THE AMBROCIO LARA DBA AMBROCIO LARA WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD OR ITS EQUIVALENT STANDARD 29 CFR 1926.501(B)(13) WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 982396, CITATION NUMBER 1, ITEM NUMBER 3, AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON JULY 17, 2014, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 10737 GAHLIA CT, LOT 28, DAPHNE, ALABAMA AND IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 996637, CITATION NUMBER 1, ITEM NUMBER 1, AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON NOVEMBER 3, 2014, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 10082 DUNMORE DR, DUNMORE SUBDIVISION, DAPHNE, ALABAMA, AND IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 1268320, CITATION NUMBER 1, ITEM NUMBER 1, AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON JANUARY 10, 2018, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT LOT 224 CHURCHILL 11645 BURBANK COURT, SPANISH FORT, ALABAMA .
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $22173

View AMBROCIO LARA's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343303004.