Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MIDWEST DRYWALL CO. INC

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of MIDWEST DRYWALL CO. INC in 1351 S RECA CT, WICHITA, KS 67209 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 343356333.

Watch Midwest Drywall CO. INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Midwest Drywall CO. INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1351 S RECA CT
City
WICHITA
State
KS
ZIP
67209
Mailing
P.O. BOX 771170, WICHITA, KS 67277
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811310
Employees
145
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12934.00 · Current $12934.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    The employer is failing to protect employees from amputation and struck-by hazards.  This was most recently documented at 1351 S. Reca Ct, Wichita, Kansas, where employees were removing and replacing the Boom Hoist Cylinders on a Lull Highlander. The employees were exposed in that an equipment specific energy control procedure had not been developed, documented, and utilized while engaging in the following activities:         a) On or about 07/27/18, while replacing the right Boom Hoist Cylinder on the Lull, Model 1044C-54.     b) On or about 08/03/18, while replacing the left Boom Hoist Cylinder on the Lull, Model 1044C-54
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12934.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): Prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck (except for training purposes), the employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by this paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5):    The employer is failing to protect employees from amputation and struck-by hazards. This was most recently documented on or about 08/03/18 at 1351 S. Reca Ct, Wichita, Kansas, where the forklift operator and employees near the forklift(s) were exposed in that the forklift operator had not been provided both formal and practical powered industrial truck training prior to operating the forklift(s).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.178 O01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12934.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(o)(1): The employer did not ensure that only stable or safely arranged loads were handled:    The employer is failing to protect employees from struck-by and crushing hazards.  This was most recently documented at 1351 S. Reca Ct, Wichita, Kansas, where employees were using forklifts to aid in the removal and replacement of the right and left Boom Hoist Cylinders on a Lull Highlander (Model 1044C-54).  The employees were exposed in that the loads on the forklifts were not safely arranged and stable.    a) On or about 07/27/18, a Nissan forklift (CPH02A20V) was used to facilitate the replacement of the right Boom Hoist Cylinder on the Lull.  In order to accomplish this task 8 foot slings were added to the forks using Countyline hitch pins (part#18PCH001TSC).  The slings and pins were added to cradle the load.  No additional means were provided to prevent the load from becoming unstable or shifting throughout the process.       b) On or about 08/03/18, a Toyota forklift (42-6FGU25) was used to facilitate the replacement of the left Boom Hoist Cylinder on the Lull.  In order to accomplish this task 8 foot slings were added to the forks using Countyline hitch pins (part#18PCH001TSC).  The slings and pins were added to cradle the load.  No additional means were provided to prevent the load from becoming unstable or shifting throughout the process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.184 C06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(6): Slings were not securely attached to their loads:    The employer is failing to protect employees from struck-by and crushing hazards. This was most recently documented at 1351 S. Reca Ct, Wichita, Kansas, where employees were using slings to aid in the removal and replacement of the right and left Boom Hoist Cylinders on a Lull Highlander (Model 1044C-54). The employees were exposed in that the slings were not securely attached to their load.      a) On or about 07/27/18, a Nissan forklift (CPH02A20V) was used to facilitate the replacement of the right Boom Hoist Cylinder on the Lull.  In order to accomplish this task 8 foot slings were added to the forks using Countyline hitch pins (part#18PCH001TSC). The slings and pins were added to cradle the load. No additional means were provided to positively attach the slings to the load.         b) On or about 08/03/18, a Toyota forklift (42-6FGU25) was used to facilitate the replacement of the left Boom Hoist Cylinder on the Lull.  In order to accomplish this task 8 foot slings were added to the forks using Countyline hitch pins (part#18PCH001TSC). The slings and pins were added to cradle the load.  No additional means were provided to positively attach the slings to the load.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.184 C09

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(9): Employee(s) were not kept clear of load(s) suspended, or about to be lifted by sling(s)    The employer is failing to protect employees from struck-by and crushing hazards. This was most recently documented at 1351 S. Reca Ct, Wichita, Kansas, where employees were using slings to aid in the removal and replacement of the right and left Boom Hoist Cylinders on a Lull Highlander (Model 1044C-54). The employees were exposed in that they were not kept clear of the suspended cylinders.    a) On or about 07/27/18, a Nissan forklift (CPH02A20V) was used to facilitate the replacement of the right Boom Hoist Cylinder on the Lull.  In order to accomplish this task 8 foot slings were added to the forks using Countyline hitch pins (part#18PCH001TSC). The slings and pins were added to cradle the load. No additional means were provided to keep the employees clear of the load(s) throughout the process.       b) On or about 08/03/18, a Toyota forklift (42-6FGU25) was used to facilitate the replacement of the left Boom Hoist Cylinder on the Lull.  In order to accomplish this task 8 foot slings were added to the forks using Countyline hitch pins (part#18PCH001TSC). The slings and pins were added to cradle the load. No additional means were provided to keep the employees clear of the load(s) throughout the process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12934.00 · Current $12934.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(i): Locks, tags, chains, wedges, key blocks, adapter pins, self-locking fasteners, or other hardware were not provided by the employer for isolating, securing or blocking of machines or equipment from energy sources:  The employer is failing to protect employees from amputation and struck-by hazards. This was most recently documented at 1351 S. Reca Ct, Wichita, Kansas, where employees were removing and replacing the Boom Hoist Cylinders on a Lull Highlander. The employees were exposed in that Locks, tags, chains, adapter pins, or other hardware were not utilized to block and secure the energy sources.       a) On or about 07/27/18, while replacing the right Boom Hoist Cylinder on the Lull, Model 1044C-54.   b) On or about 08/03/18, while replacing the left Boom Hoist Cylinder on the Lull, Model 1044C-54
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.178 A04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12934.00 · Current $12934.00
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:   The employer is failing to protect employees from amputation and crush-by hazards.  This was most recently documented at 1351 S. Reca Ct, Wichita, Kansas, where employees were removing and replacing the right and left Boom Hoist Cylinders on a Lull Highlander Model 1044C-54. The employees were exposed in that additions and modifications that affected the capacity and safe operation of the forklift were added without the manufacturer's written approval.    a) On or about 07/27/18, a Nissan forklift (CPH02A20V) was used to facilitate the replacement of the right Boom Hoist Cylinder on the Lull.  In order to accomplish this task 8 foot slings were added to the forks using Countyline hitch pins (part#18PCH001TSC).  The addition and placement of the slings and pins affected the safe operation of the forklift as the calculated center of gravity and lifting capacity of the forklift was modified.  Manufacturer's written approval was not provided prior to the addition of the slings and pins.    b) On or about 08/03/18, a Toyota forklift (42-6FGU25) was used to facilitate the replacement of the left Boom Hoist Cylinder on the Lull.  In order to accomplish this task 8 foot slings were added to the forks using Countyline hitch pins (part#18PCH001TSC).  The addition and placement of the slings and pins affected the safe operation of the forklift as the calculated center of gravity and lifting capacity of the forklift was modified.  Manufacturer's written approval was not provided prior to the addition of the slings and pins.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $7391.00 · Current $7361.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips:  The employer is failing to protect employees from amputation and struck-by hazards. This was most recently documented on or about 08/03/18 at 1351 S. Reca Ct, Wichita, Kansas, where an employee was using a 20 inch Craftsman Drill Press (Model 113.213213, SN 9609200009). The employee was exposed in that a machine guard was not in place to protect the operator from contact with the rotating bit and flying chips and debris.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7361
  • — Z (S) $7391

1910.212 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $5543.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving:    The employer is failing to protect employees from struck-by hazards. This was most recently documented on or about 08/03/18 at 1351 S. Reca Ct, Wichita, Kansas, where an employee was using a 20 inch Craftsman Drill Press (Model 113.213213, SN 9609200009).  The employee was exposed in that the drill press was not anchored to keep it from moving while in operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $5543

View MIDWEST DRYWALL CO. INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343356333.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.