OSHA Inspection: ROBERTO FIRIAS

Issued

2019-01-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-01-25 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $311.00 · Current $311.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  The employer has not certified to OSHA for the following item(s) cited in inspection #1349116  Citation #1 Item #1; 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Abatement was due 11/16/2018

Issued

2019-01-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-01-25 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $311.00 · Current $311.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.   The employer has not certified to OSHA for the following item(s) cited in inspection #1349116   Citation #1 Item #2; 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Abatement was due 11/16/2018

Issued

2018-10-22 00:00:00

Abate by

2018-11-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1663.00 · Current $1663.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  At the jobsite located at 1949 N. 9th St. Salina, Kansas:  Employees engaged in commercial roofing activities using a pneumatic nailer were exposed to struck-by hazards in that eye protection was not provided.

Issued

2018-10-22 00:00:00

Abate by

2018-11-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system:  At the jobsite located at 1949 N. 9th St. Salina, Kansas:  Employees engaged in commercial roofing activities from a 5:12 pitch roof were exposed to fall hazards of approx. 33 feet from the eave to ground below in that fall protection was not provided and/or warning systems with safety monitor was not utilized.