Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DRALCO SYSTEMS, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DRALCO SYSTEMS, LLC in 1219 FORT WORTH HIGHWAY, WEATHERFORD, TX 76086 (NAICS 333132). OSHA activity number 343874368.

Watch Dralco Systems, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dralco Systems, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DRALCO SYSTEMS, LLC
Site address
1219 FORT WORTH HIGHWAY
City
WEATHERFORD
State
TX
ZIP
76086
Mailing
1219 FORT WORTH HIGHWAY, WEATHERFORD, TX 76086
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333132
Employees
65
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A03

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): 29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3):  The employer did not ensure that each affected employee who wore prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involved eye hazards wore eye protection that incorporated the prescription in its design, or wore eye protection that could be worn over the prescription lenses without disturbing the proper position of the prescription lenses or the protective lenses.  In the production shop, employees wore prescription lenses that were not ANSI approved safety glasses, nor designed to provide eye protection while operating the Bystonic Laser,  exposing employees to the hazard of eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3978

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  In the production area, employees wearing 3M half mask air purifying respirator during spray painting, welding, and blasting operations were not medically evaluated prior to initial use of the respirator exposing them to respiratory and physiological hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3978

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter:      In the production area, employees wearing a 3M half mask air purifying respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator and at least annually thereafter exposing them to respiratory and physiological hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6630.00 · Current $4000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:      ON or about March 6, 2019, the employer did not inspect its energy control procedure at least annually to ensure the procedure and hazardous energy sources for affected and authorized employees for machines were adequate and being followed exposing employees to the hazard of being caught in or struck by the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $4000
  • — Z (S) $6630

1910.147 D04 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    In the production area, the employer did not develop written lockout/tagout procedures describing how to lockout and control hazardous energy sources for affected and authorized employees for machines, such as but not limited to, the Piranha Iron Worker and the Bystronics Laser machine, which exposed employees to the hazard of being caught in or struck by the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 P01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): If at any time a powered industrial truck is found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe, the truck shall be taken out of service until it has been restored to safe operating condition.      a) At the establishment, in the shipping department, employees required to operate the 4500 Doosan Daewood Forklift, model 625E, needed to have the seat replaced.    b) At the establishment, in the shipping department, employees required to operate the 4000 pound Hyster forklift, needed to have the seat replaced and the lights repaired.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3978

1910.184 H05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7956.00 · Current $4200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(h)(5): Removal from service. Natural and synthetic fiber rope slings shall be immediately removed from service if any of the following conditions are present such as broken or cut fibers:      In the production shop, the employees were using a 2 foot wide synthetic fiber sling that was severely cut and frayed, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by the load.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7956

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6630.00 · Current $5500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):      In the production shop, employees operating the Piranha Ironworker machine, model 6509, were exposed to amputation hazards.  Adequate machine guarding was not in place to prevent exposure to point of operation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5500
  • — Z (S) $6630

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5304.00 · Current $3300.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel:    At the establishment, No tongue guards were provided on the Dayton bench grinder, model 7075, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by the wheel and flying parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3300
  • — Z (S) $5304

1910.305 G02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5304.00 · Current $5304.00
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap:      At the establishment, in the production area, the orange extension cord supplying power to the Dewalt Right Hand Angle Grinder was severely cut and frayed on several places on the cord, exposing employees to the hazard of electrical burns and shock.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5304
  • — Z (S) $5304

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables shall be connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided that will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws.    At the establishment, in the production area,, the employer did not ensure a strain relief device was used to prevent tension to the orange extension cord supplying power to the Dewalt Right Hand Angle Grinder, exposing employees to the hazard of electrical burns and shock.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3978

1910.1200 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 65 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5304.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which described how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200 paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training would be met.  On or about March 06, 2019 and a times prior thereto, the employer did not update its HAZCOM program to the new Global Harmonized System with the new safety data sheets, warnings and training as required for each new chemical, warning and pictograms under the new system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5304

View DRALCO SYSTEMS, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

RNWBL

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343874368.