OSHA Inspection: MACH 1 LUBE, TUNE & AC, INC.

Issued

Jun 7, 2019

Abate by

Jun 19, 2019

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer do not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures. The program shall be updated as necessary to reflect those changes in workplace conditions that affect respirator use. The employer shall include in the program the following provisions of this section, as applicable:  a) At the paint booth, on or about April 9, 2019, the employer did not establish a written respiratory protection program for employees who were required to wear 3M cartridge style half-face respirators while performing painting work activities on automobile parts.

Issued

Jun 7, 2019

Abate by

Jun 19, 2019

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator.  a) In the paint shop, on or about April 9, 2019, the employer did not provide for medical evaluations for employees who were required to wear 3M cartridge style respirators while performing painting operations.

Issued

Jun 7, 2019

Abate by

Jun 19, 2019

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) as stated in this paragraph:  a) At the paint booth, on or about April 9, 2019, the employer did not ensure employee who was required to wear a 3M cartridge style half-face respirator, while performing painting work activities, were fit tested.

Issued

Jun 7, 2019

Abate by

Jun 19, 2019

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:   a) At the facility, or about April 9, 2019, the employer did not develop or maintain a written hazard communication program for employees who used chemicals such as, but not limited to, Cromax Basecoat Balancer.

Issued

Jun 7, 2019

Abate by

Jun 19, 2019

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and safety data sheets:  a) At the paint area, on or about April 9, 2019, the employer did not provide training for employees working with chemicals such as, but not limited to, Cromax Basecoat Balanace, during the course their workday.