Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,288Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-24 Last loaded 2026-07-29

OSHA Inspection: COASTAL MARINE CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of COASTAL MARINE CONSTRUCTION, LLC in CONLEY MARINE TERMINAL 700 SUMMER STREET, SOUTH BOSTON, MA 02127 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 343949137.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Coastal Marine Construction, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Coastal Marine Construction, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
CONLEY MARINE TERMINAL 700 SUMMER STREET
City
SOUTH BOSTON
State
MA
ZIP
02127
Mailing
960 TURNPIKE STREET SUITE 1C, CANTON, MA 02021
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237310
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1437 H02 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2019
Abate by
Oct 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $8,354 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1437(h)(2)(ii): The employer's monthly inspections did not ensure that the vessel/flotation device was not taking on water.  Jobsite:  Marrese barge  The barge was leaking such that water needed to be pumped out on a regular basis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $8354

1926.1437 H04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2019
Abate by
Oct 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1437(h)(4)(i): The external portion of the barge, pontoons, vessel or other means of floatation used were not inspected annually by a qualified person who has the expertise with respect to vessel/floatation devices;  The company did not ensure that the external portion of barges were inspected in accordance with OSHA requirements.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1437 H05 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2019
Abate by
Nov 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1437(h)(5)(i): A marine engineer, marine architect, licensed surveyor, or other qualified person who has expertise with respect to vessels/flotation devices did not survey the internal portion of the barge, pontoons, vessel, or other means of flotation.  The company did not ensure that the four year inspection of the internal portions of barges was performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1437 H06

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2019
Abate by
Nov 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1437(h)(6): The employer did not ensure that the information required in 1926.1437(h)(2), (h)(4), and (h)(5) for monthly, annual, and four-year barge crane inspections was documented and maintained in accordance with 1926.1412(e)(3) and (f)(7).  The company did not have documentation that annual and four year inspection of barges were conducted that met OSHA requirements.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1434 A02 I A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2019
Abate by
Sep 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,967 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1434(a)(2)(i)(A): The employer did not ensure that changes to the equipment were approved by a registered professional engineer.  Location:  Maresse, Excalibur, and Jonathon barges.  Changes to the crane tie-down se-up were made within the approval of the engineers firm that produced the tie-down drawings.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5967

1926.1437 N05 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2019
Abate by
Sep 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1437(n)(5)(i): The crane/derrick was not physically attached to the barge, pontoons, vessel or other means of flotation.  Location:  Excalibur barge.  The employer did not secure the crane to the barge from movement or in the manner specified by the marine engineer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1437 N05 IV E

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2019
Abate by
Sep 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1437(n)(5)(iv)(E): The employer did not ensure that cranes were secured from movement during operation.  Location:  Maresse and Jonathon barges.  The employer did not secure the cranes to the barges in the manner specified by the marine engineer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,967 · Current $0 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck-by, hypothermia and drowning hazards from a badly damaged crane timber mat.    The timber mat used to support the crane on the Marrese barge was badly damaged.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5967

View Coastal Marine Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343949137.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.