FORT WORTH, TX —
OSHA Inspection: MASTEC SERVICES, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MASTEC SERVICES, INC. in TEXAS AND MONROE ST., FORT WORTH, TX 76108 (NAICS 221119). OSHA activity number 344365770.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MASTEC SERVICES, INC.
- Site address
- TEXAS AND MONROE ST.
- City
- FORT WORTH
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76108
- Mailing
- 4351 DALE EARNHARDT WAY, NORTHLAKE, TX 76262
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 221119
- Employees
- 22000
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.269 C02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $13494.00 · Current $13494.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.269(c)(2): The employer did not ensure job briefing cover at least the following subjects: hazards associated with the job, work procedures involved, special precautions, energy-source controls, and personal protective equipment requirements: On or about October 3, 2019, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure the job briefing; covered hazards associated with the job, work procedures involved, special precautions, energy-source controls, and personal protective equipment requirements.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $13494
- — Z (S) $13494
1910.269 L03 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $13494.00 · Current $13494.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.269(l)(3)(iii): The employer did not ensure that no employee approached or took any conductive object closer to exposed energized parts than the employer's established minimum approach distance, unless provisions described in (l) (3) (iii) (A) - (C) were followed: On or about October 3, 2019, and at times prior thereto, the employer allowed employees to approach closer to exposed energized parts than the employer's established minimum approach distance (MAD), exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $13494
- — Z (S) $13494
1910.332 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $13494.00 · Current $13494.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(2): Employees, who were not qualified persons, were not trained in and familiar with electrically related safety practices not specifically addressed by 29 CFR 1910.331 through 29 CFR 1910.335, but which were necessary for their safety: On or about October 3, 2019, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that employees, who were not qualified persons, were trained in and familiar with electrically related safety practices.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $13494
- — Z (S) $13494
1910.333 C05
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $13494.00 · Current $13494.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(c)(5): When an employee worked in a confined or enclosed space (such as a manhole or vault) that contained exposed energized parts, the employer did not provide and/or the employee did not use protective shields, protective barriers, or insulating materials as necessary to avoid inadvertent contact: On or about October 3, 2019, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that employees used protective shields, protective barrier or insulating materials as necessary to avoid inadvertent contact to exposed energized parts.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $13494
- — Z (S) $13494
1910.333 C09
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $13494.00 · Current $13494.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(c)(9): Where live parts presented an electrical contact hazard, employees performed housekeeping duties at such close distances to the parts that there was a possibility of contact: On or about October 3, 2019, and at times prior thereto, the employer allowed employees to perform housekeeping duties at close distances to parts where there was an electrical contact hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $13494
- — Z (S) $13494
1910.335 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $134937.00 · Current $134937.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with, and did not use, electrical protective equipment that is appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed: On or about October 3, 2019, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that employees working in areas where potential electrical hazards existed used appropriate electrical protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — C (W) $134937
- — Z (W) $134937
More inspections at MASTEC SERVICES, INC.
HARKER HEIGHTS, TX—2023-05-25 00:00:00
MASTEC SERVICES, INC.
ORANGE PARK, FL—2005-03-30 00:00:00
MASTEC SERVICES, INC.
View MASTEC SERVICES, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 221119)
SHELTON, WA—2025-09-30 00:00:00
WA317988056 - P U D #3 OF MASON COUNTY
SPOKANE VALLEY, WA—2025-07-10 00:00:00
WA317986828 - MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO
METALINE FALLS, WA—2025-07-01 00:00:00
WA317986731 - P U D #1 PEND OREILLE COUNTY
RAYMOND, WA—2025-03-05 00:00:00
WA317984921 - PACIFIC COUNTY PUD #2
SEQUIM, WA—2024-11-14 00:00:00
WA317983248 - PUD #1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY
More inspections in TX
RICHMOND, TX—2026-07-17 00:00:00
CORNELIUS NURSERIES, INC.
HOUSTON, TX—2026-07-17 00:00:00
HOLLOWAY HOUSTON, INC.
BONHAM, TX—2026-07-17 00:00:00
VOLUNTARY PURCHASING GROUPS, INC.
SNYDER, TX—2026-07-16 00:00:00
RNWBL
WICHITA FALLS, TX—2026-07-16 00:00:00
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344365770.