Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: AMBROSIO AGUAYO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AMBROSIO AGUAYO in 722 S LAKEVIEW ST, HAYSVILLE, KS 67060 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344638051.

Watch Ambrosio Aguayo — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ambrosio Aguayo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AMBROSIO AGUAYO
Site address
722 S LAKEVIEW ST
City
HAYSVILLE
State
KS
ZIP
67060
Mailing
5464 S SPRUCE ST, WICHITA, KS 67216
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2313.00 · Current $1157.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  Employees engaged in ground hand activities working below employees engaged in framing activities were exposed to struck-by hazards in that head protection was not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1156.5
  • — Z (S) $2313

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2313.00 · Current $1157.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  Employees engaged in residential framing activities using a pneumatic nailer were exposed to struck-by hazards in that eye protection was not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1156.5
  • — Z (S) $2313

1926.405 A02 II J

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1735.00 · Current $868.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(J): Extension cord sets used with portable electric tools and appliances were not of the three-wire type:    Employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards.  Employees engaged in framing activities were exposed to electrical shock hazards in that the flexible cord used to supply power to tools used on job site was missing the ground conductor pin.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $867.5
  • — Z (S) $1735

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1735.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Strain relief. Flexible cords shall be connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided which will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws.    Employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards.  Employees engaged in framing activities were exposed to electrical shock hazards in that the flexible cord protective layer was pulled away from the plug end of the cord.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1735

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4048.00 · Current $2024.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    Employees were exposed to fall hazards.  Employees engaged in residential framing activities were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12 feet from the roof to the ground in that fall protection was not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2024
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2892.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    Employees engaged in residential framing activities were exposed to falls from approximately 12 feet, in that the aluminum ladder used to access the roof did not extend 3 feet from the eave of the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2892

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344638051.