1,224,460Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-16
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: JPD ENVIRONMENTAL AND DEMOLITION, INC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of JPD ENVIRONMENTAL AND DEMOLITION, INC in 130 VALIANT ST. BLDG. 222, GOODFELLOW AFB, TX 76908 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 344720990.

Watch JPD Environmental AND Demolition, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JPD Environmental AND Demolition, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
130 VALIANT ST. BLDG. 222
City
GOODFELLOW AFB
State
TX
ZIP
76908
Mailing
7310 BLANCO ROAD, SUITE 302, SAN MARCOS, TX 78666
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238910
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 M05 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3084.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(5)(i): When a powered industrial truck was left unattended, load engaging means were not fully lowered, controls were not netralized, power was not shut off, and brakes set.  On or about April 6th, 2020, a telescopic forklift that was being used in support of a demolition project was left unattended with the load engaging means raised and extended, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by the vehicle or supported load.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3084

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5398.00 · Current $3239.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system.    On or about April 6th, 2020, and at times prior thereto, the employer for a demolition project had not correctly and fully implemented a safety monitor system and warning line system for employees working on a rooftop, exposing employees to the hazard of falling from height.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3238.8
  • — Z (S) $5398

1926.502 F01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(1): Warning lines were not erected around all sides of the roof work area:  On or about April 6th, 2020, fall protection warning lines for demolition activities did not fully surround all areas of access to the rooftop work area, including but not limited to the site of a fall accident, exposing employees to the hazard of falling from height.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D21

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3084.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service:    On or about April 8th, 2020, and at times prior thereto, employees working on the rooftop of a demolition project did not conduct inspections on their personal fall arrest systems (PFAS's) before each usage, exposing employees to the hazard of falling from height.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $600
  • — Z (S) $3084

1926.502 F02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(2)(ii): The rope, wire, or chain was not rigged or supported in such a way that its lowest point (including sag) was not less than 34 inches (0.9 m) from the walking/working surface and its highest point no more than 39 inches (1.0 m) from the walking/working surface.    On or about April 6th, 2020, and at times prior thereto, the fall protection warning lines for demolition activities occurring on a rooftop had a high point of 50" from the walking/working surface, exposing employees to the hazard of falling from height.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 H01 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5398.00 · Current $3239.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(iii): The safety monitor was not on the same walking/working surface and within visual sighting distance of the employee being monitored.    On or about April 6th, 2020, and at times prior thereto, the fall protection safety monitor for demolition activities was on the ground while employees were still on the roof, exposing employees to the hazard of falling from height.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3238.8
  • — Z (S) $5398

1926.503 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5398.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii):    The employer did not ensure that employees were trained in and understood multiple required elements of fall protection at the jobsite, including but not limited to the proper use, operation, and erection of warning lines systems, the necessity of inspections of Personal Fall Arrest Systems, and the proper use of safety monitor systems, exposing employees to the hazard of falling from height.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $600
  • — Z (S) $5398

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344720990.