Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
3,913,242Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BEST CONNECTICUT ROOFING, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BEST CONNECTICUT ROOFING, LLC in 35 GOODWILL AVENUE, MERIDEN, CT 06451 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345147102.

Watch Best Connecticut Roofing, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Best Connecticut Roofing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
35 GOODWILL AVENUE
City
MERIDEN
State
CT
ZIP
06451
Mailing
35 GOODWILL AVENUE, MERIDEN, CT 06451
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $329.00 · Current $329.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:   Location:  35 Goodwill Avenue, Meriden, Connecticut  Abatement certification and verification for Citation 01, Item 001; Citation 01, Item 002a; and Citation 01, Item 002b with a final order date of 6/9/2021 was not received within 10 calendar days (by  5/29/2021) following the abatement due date (5/19/2021).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $329

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4096.00 · Current $4096.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    Jobsite:   Each employee working on the approximately 10 in 12 pitch roof  with an approximately 22 foot eave to ground fall distance were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.502 D17

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(17):The attachment point of the body belt was not located in the center of the wearer's back. The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head.  Jobsite: Fall protection lifeline/lanyard attachment points were located at the center of employee's front torso and not located in the center of the employee's back while working on an approximately 10 in 12 pitched residential roofing with an approximately 22 foot eave to ground fall distance.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Jobsite: Each employee performing roofing work on an approximately 10 in 12 pitched residential type roof with an approximately 22 foot eave to ground fall distance was not provided with a fall protection training program to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to minimize/eliminate those hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View BEST CONNECTICUT ROOFING, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345147102.