HOUSTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: BIG CITY MANUFACTURING, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BIG CITY MANUFACTURING, INC. in 7561 MORLEY STREET, HOUSTON, TX 77061 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 345273353.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BIG CITY MANUFACTURING, INC.
- Site address
- 7561 MORLEY STREET
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77061
- Mailing
- P O BOX 1019, FRIENDSWOOD, TX 77549
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332999
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.215 A01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3121.00 · Current $1873.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(1): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not used with safety guard(s): a) At this facility, a Jett bench grinder lacked a spindle guard, exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1872.6
- — Z (S) $3121
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work: a) At this facility, the Jett bench grinder lacked a work rest, exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 G01 I B
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2340.00 · Current $1404.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(B): For electric equipment operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, and likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized, the width of the working space in front of electrical equipment was less than the width of the equipment or 762 mm (30 inches), whichever was greater : a) At the sound end of the building, the width of the working space in front of the electrical equipment was less than 30 inches, exposing employees to electrical hazards. b) At the engraving room, the width of the working space in front of the electrical equipment was less than the width of the equipment, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1404
- — Z (S) $2340
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2340.00 · Current $1404.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: a) At the south end of the building, the unused openings to an electrical power switch were not effectively closed, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1404
- — Z (S) $2340
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2340.00 · Current $1404.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: a) At the sound end of the building strain relief was not provided to the male end of the electrical cord, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1404
- — Z (S) $2340
1904.29 A
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent: a) At this facility, OSHA Forms 300, 301 and 300A were not used to record injuries and illnesses.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $438.00 · Current $263.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: a) The employer did not establish and implement a worksite-specific procedures for ensuring employees voluntarily using a 3M half face respirator, #60921, were medically able to use that respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $262.8
- — Z (O) $438
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) The employer did not provide a medical evaluation for employees voluntarily using a 3M half face respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332999)
SMITHFIELD, UT—2026-07-16 00:00:00
METAL VISION INC.
MINNEAPOLIS, MN—2026-07-15 00:00:00
111597 - CHANDLER INDUSTRIES INC - BLAINE DIVISION
DUBUQUE, IA—2026-07-13 00:00:00
A09CS000012FNXZAAQ - DUBUQUE STEEL PRODUCTS
SPRING, TX—2026-07-10 00:00:00
DORSTENER WIRE TECH INC.
SAN ANTONIO, TX—2026-07-10 00:00:00
ED LONG'S METAL WORKS
More inspections in TX
RICHMOND, TX—2026-07-17 00:00:00
CORNELIUS NURSERIES, INC.
HOUSTON, TX—2026-07-17 00:00:00
HOLLOWAY HOUSTON, INC.
BONHAM, TX—2026-07-17 00:00:00
VOLUNTARY PURCHASING GROUPS, INC.
SNYDER, TX—2026-07-16 00:00:00
RNWBL
WICHITA FALLS, TX—2026-07-16 00:00:00
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345273353.