BOSTON, MA —
OSHA Inspection: KEVIN GAETA
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of KEVIN GAETA in COLUMBIA POINT, BOSTON, MA 02125 (NAICS 561720). OSHA activity number 346264781.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KEVIN GAETA
- Site address
- COLUMBIA POINT
- City
- BOSTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02125
- Mailing
- PO BOX 2653, ATTLEBORO, MA 02703
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561720
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.28 B01 I
- Issued
- Mar 23, 2023
- Abate by
- May 11, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Except as provided elsewhere in this section 29 CFR 1910.28, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by one or more of the systems described in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Location: Jobsite Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 60 feet where inadequate fall protection was utilized and employees were not connected to an anchorage point.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4688
- — Z (S) $4688
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Mar 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $1,624 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): Location: Jobsite The employer did not assess and select adequate personal protective equipment while performing window washing operations inside the building and exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1624
- — Z (S) $4688
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Mar 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment: Location: Jobsite The employer did not perform adequate training to employees required to wear fall protection while performing window washing operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4688
- — Z (S) $4688
1910.140 E02 VIII
- Issued
- Mar 23, 2023
- Abate by
- May 11, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.140(e)(2)(viii): The employer did not ensure when using window cleaners' positioning systems, no employee works on a window sill or ledge on which there is snow, ice, or any other slippery condition, or one that is weakened or rotted. Location: Jobsite The employer did not ensure employees cleaning windows had a working surface that was not slippery.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4688
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561720)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346264781.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.