Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MUSTANG ELECTRIC

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of MUSTANG ELECTRIC in 384 BLAZING STAR, HORSESHOE BAY, TX 78657 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 346440225.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mustang Electric — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mustang Electric is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MUSTANG ELECTRIC
Site address
384 BLAZING STAR
City
HORSESHOE BAY
State
TX
ZIP
78657
Mailing
7503 FM2147 SUITE 2, HORSESHOE BAY, TX 78657
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238210
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2023
Abate by
Jul 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs that provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)   On or about January 11, 2023, and at times prior thereto, employees were installing electrical wiring on a residential home under construction without inspections being conducted by the employer, exposing employees to hazards such as, but not limited to, falls and struck-by.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.50 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2023
Abate by
Jul 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.50(c): A person who has a valid certificate in first-aid training was not available at the worksite to render first-aid:  On or about January 11, 2023, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not have a person who was trained to render first-aid at the worksite, exposing employees to a delay in medical treatment.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2023
Abate by
Jul 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height-to-base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph.   On or about January 11, 2023, and at times prior thereto, an employee was working from a mobile scaffold that was not restrained where the height to base ratio exceeded 4:1, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2023
Abate by
Jul 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.   On or about January 11, 2023, and at times prior thereto, an employee was working from the top platform of a mobile scaffold over 10 feet high without fall protection, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.452 W02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2023
Abate by
Jul 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR  1926.452(w)(2): Scaffold casters and wheels were not locked with positive wheel and/or wheel and swivel locks, or equivalent means, to prevent movement of the scaffold while the scaffold was used in a stationary manner:  On or about January 11, 2023, and at times prior thereto, an employee was working from a mobile scaffold over 10 feet high without locking out the casters, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.452 W06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2023
Abate by
Jul 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.452(w)(6): Employees were not prohibited from riding on scaffolds:    On or about January 11, 2023, and at times prior thereto, an employee standing on mobile scaffold platform was moved by other employees, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2023
Abate by
Jul 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  On or about January 11, 2023, and at times prior thereto, employees were working from scaffolding without receiving training from the employer, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Mustang Electric's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346440225.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.