MILFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: HONG KONG CONSTRUCTION INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HONG KONG CONSTRUCTION INC in 765 BOSTON POST ROAD, MILFORD, CT 06460 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 346833668.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HONG KONG CONSTRUCTION INC
- Site address
- 765 BOSTON POST ROAD
- City
- MILFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06460
- Mailing
- 2933 PLEASANT HILL ROAD SUITE A2, DULUTH, GA 30096
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $376.00 · Current $376.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 765 Boston Post Road, Milford, Connecticut Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 1a; Citation 001, Item 01b; Citation 001, Item 02a; Citation 001, Item0 2b; Citation 001, Item 3; Citation 001, Item 04; Citation 001, Item 05a; Citation 001, Item 05b and Citation 001, Item 06 with a final order date of 10/19/2023 was not received within 10 calendar days (by 9/10/2023) following the abatement due date (8/30/2023).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3349.00 · Current $3349.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets. Jobsite: On or about July 11, 2023, the employer did not ensure that an employee walking below a scaffolding platform was protected from falling objects by the use of a hard hat when exposed to over head hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.451 H02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(i): The area below the scaffold was not barricaded, and employees were not prohibited from entering the hazard area. Jobsite: On or about July 11, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the area directly under a scaffolding system was barricaded to protect employees from falling objects.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3349.00 · Current $3349.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation. Jobsite: On or about July 11, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the scaffolding system in use had base plates attached to the legs to prevent settling or displacement.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.451 C02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement. Jobsite: On or about July 11, 2023, the employer failed to ensure that the scaffolding system in use was erected on level ground to avoid displacement or collapse hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 C03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3349.00 · Current $3349.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(3):Supported scaffold poles, legs, post, frames, and/or uprights were not plumb. Jobsite: On or about July 11, 2023, the employer failed to ensure that the scaffold post legs and frames were plumb to prevent swaying or displacement.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4688.00 · Current $4688.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration. Jobsite: On or about July 11, 2023, the employer did not ensure that a scaffolding system used by employees was erected by a competent person so employees were not subject to the hazards of displacement or collapse.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4688.00 · Current $4688.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level. Jobsite: On or about July 11, 2023, the employer failed to ensure that an employee applying stucco to the face of the building from a scaffolding system approximately 11 feet, 2 inches from ground level was protected from fall hazards with either personal fall arrest equipment or a guardrail system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. Jobsite: On or about July 11, 2023, the employer did not ensure that an employee applying stucco from a scaffolding system approximately 11 feet, 2 inches from ground level was properly trained to recognize the hazards from falls while working from a scaffold.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 H02 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3349.00 · Current $3349.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toe-board was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below: Jobsite: On or about July 11, 2023, the employer did not ensure that toe-boards were installed on the scaffolding system to protect employees from the hazard of falling materials when working approximately 11 feet, 2 inches underneath the scaffold.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
MARIANNA, FL—2026-07-13
PRIMETIME MOBILE MASONRY LLC
LOMPOC, CA—2026-07-10
UNKNOWN EMPLOYER
FREEHOLD, NJ—2026-07-10
CRAIG'S MASONRY & HARDSCAPE LLC
CINCINNATI, OH—2026-07-09
ALL AMERICAN CONCRETE LLC
NEW YORK, NY—2026-07-08
JEY CONSTRUCTIONS WORKS CORP
More inspections in CT
BRIDGEPORT, CT—2026-07-10
WRR, INC.
BERLIN, CT—2026-07-10
MMF CONSTRUCTION LLC
NAUGATUCK, CT—2026-07-08
WHITING-TURNER LCT2 JOINT VENTURE
SOMERS, CT—2026-07-08
F&G RECYCLING LLC
STAMFORD, CT—2026-07-07
FAIRFIELD AVENUE MAINTENANCE COMPANY, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346833668.