CAMBRIDGE, MA —
OSHA Inspection: WAVE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of WAVE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. in 250 BENT STREET, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138 (NAICS 517919). OSHA activity number 347090045.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WAVE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Site address
- 250 BENT STREET
- City
- CAMBRIDGE
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02138
- Mailing
- 133 WINTHROP AVE., WEST WARWICK, RI 02893
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 517919
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6452.00 · Current $6452.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: On or about 11/7/23, Victor Matherly was not trained or qualified in electrical safety recognition so he could identify and avoid electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $6452
- — C (S) $6452
- — Z (S) $6452
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6452.00 · Current $6452.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: In the Alternative: 29 CFR 1910.332(b)(2): Employees who were not qualified persons were not trained in and familiar with any electrically related safety practices not specifically addressed by 29 CFR 1910.331 through 29 CFR 1910.335, but which were necessary for their safety: a) On or about 11/7/23, Omar Hernandez was not trained or qualified in electrical safety recognition so he could identify and avoid electrical hazards. b) On or about 11/7/23, Ashley Quesada was not trained or qualified in electrical safety recognition so she could identify and avoid electrical hazards. c) On or about 11/7/23, Lester Losada was not trained or qualified in electrical safety recognition so he could identify and avoid electrical hazards. d) On or about 11/7/23, Alexander Pantoja was not trained or qualified in electrical safety recognition so he could identify and avoid electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $6452
- — C (S) $6452
- — Z (S) $6452
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6452.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: In the Alternative: 1910.332(b)(2): Employees who were not qualified persons were not trained in and familiar with any electrically related safety practices not specifically addressed by 29 CFR 1910.331 through 29 CFR 1910.335, but which were necessary for their safety: On or about 11/7/23, Ashley Quesada was not trained or qualified in electrical safety recognition so she could identify and avoid electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $6452
- — Z (S) $6452
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6452.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: In the Alternative: 29 CFR 1910.332(b)(2): Employees who were not qualified persons were not trained in and familiar with any electrically related safety practices not specifically addressed by 29 CFR 1910.331 through 29 CFR 1910.335, but which were necessary for their safety: On or about 11/7/23, Lester Losada was not trained or qualified in electrical safety recognition so he could identify and avoid electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $6452
- — Z (S) $6452
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6452.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: In the Alternative: 29 CFR 1910.332(b)(2): Employees who were not qualified persons were not trained in and familiar with any electrically related safety practices not specifically addressed by 29 CFR 1910.331 through 29 CFR 1910.335, but which were necessary for their safety: On or about 11/7/23, Alexander Pantoja was not trained or qualified in electrical safety recognition so he could identify and avoid electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $6452
- — Z (S) $6452
1910.333 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6452.00 · Current $6452.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): No employer shall permit an employee to work in such proximity to any part of an electric power circuit that the employee could contact the electric power circuit in the course of work, unless the employee is protected against electric shock by deenergizing the circuit and grounding it or by guarding it effectively by insulation or other means. In the Alternative: 29 CFR 1910.333(a): Safety-related work practices were not employed to prevent electric shock or other injuries resulting from either direct or indirect electrical contacts, when work was performed near or on equipment or circuits which were or could be energized. On or about 11/7/23, the employer permitted an employee to work in close proximity to an energized electric power circuit without protecting the employee from electric shock hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $6452
- — C (S) $6452
- — Z (S) $6452
1910.333 B02 IV B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6452.00 · Current $6452.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(3): Before work was begun the employer did not ascertain by inquiry or direct observation, or by instruments, whether any part of an energized electric power circuit, exposed or concealed, was so located that the performance of the work could bring any person, tool, or machine into physical or electrical contact with the electric power circuit. The employer did not post and maintain proper warning signs where such a circuit existed. The employer did not advise employees of the location of such lines, the hazards involved, and the protective measures to be taken: In the Alternative: 29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(iv)(B): A qualified person did not use test equipment to test the circuit elements and electrical parts of equipment to which employees will be exposed and shall verify that the circuit elements and equipment parts are deenergized: On or about 11/7/23, the employer began work without determining if employees could contact any part of an energized circuit and did not post warning signs and advise employees of the location of the circuit, hazards, and protective measures they need to take.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $6452
- — C (S) $6452
- — Z (S) $6452
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 517919)
DORCHESTER, MA—2026-06-24
VERIZON
MECHANICSBURG, PA—2026-06-04
RJL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
MENASHA, WI—2026-06-03
ALVARADO TELECOM LLC
OLD HICKORY, TN—2026-06-03
SOURCE BROADBAND SERVICES, LLC
PORTAGE, MI—2026-05-26
TOWNSQUARE MEDIA KALAMAZOO, LLC
More inspections in MA
WORCESTER, MA—2026-07-10
QUINSIGAMOND COMMUNITY COLLEGE
FITCHBURG, MA—2026-07-10
KELLEY WOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
EVERETT, MA—2026-07-10
HORIZON RETAIL CONSTRUCTION INC
NORTON, MA—2026-07-09
DYNAMIC RESIDENTIAL ROOF MARKETING, LLC
NORTON, MA—2026-07-09
LM GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347090045.