Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
3,913,242Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: WAVE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of WAVE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. in 250 BENT STREET, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138 (NAICS 517919). OSHA activity number 347090045.

Watch Wave Communications, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Wave Communications, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
250 BENT STREET
City
CAMBRIDGE
State
MA
ZIP
02138
Mailing
133 WINTHROP AVE., WEST WARWICK, RI 02893
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
517919
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6452.00 · Current $6452.00
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2):  The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:    On or about 11/7/23, Victor Matherly was not trained or qualified in electrical safety recognition so he could identify and avoid electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $6452
  • — C (S) $6452
  • — Z (S) $6452

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6452.00 · Current $6452.00
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2):  The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:    In the Alternative:   29 CFR  1910.332(b)(2):  Employees who were not qualified persons were not trained in and familiar with any electrically related safety practices not specifically addressed by 29 CFR 1910.331 through 29 CFR 1910.335, but which were necessary for their safety:    a) On or about 11/7/23, Omar Hernandez was not trained or qualified in electrical safety recognition so he could identify and avoid electrical hazards.  b) On or about 11/7/23, Ashley Quesada was not trained or qualified in electrical safety recognition so she could identify and avoid electrical hazards.  c) On or about 11/7/23, Lester Losada was not trained or qualified in electrical safety recognition so he could identify and avoid electrical hazards.  d) On or about 11/7/23, Alexander Pantoja was not trained or qualified in electrical safety recognition so he could identify and avoid electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $6452
  • — C (S) $6452
  • — Z (S) $6452

1926.21 B02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6452.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2):  The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  In the Alternative:  1910.332(b)(2):   Employees who were not qualified persons were not trained in and familiar with any electrically related safety practices not specifically addressed by 29 CFR 1910.331 through 29 CFR 1910.335, but which were necessary for their safety:    On or about 11/7/23, Ashley Quesada was not trained or qualified in electrical safety recognition so she could identify and avoid electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $6452
  • — Z (S) $6452

1926.21 B02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6452.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2):  The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  In the Alternative:  29 CFR  1910.332(b)(2):  Employees who were not qualified persons were not trained in and familiar with any electrically related safety practices not specifically addressed by 29 CFR 1910.331 through 29 CFR 1910.335, but which were necessary for their safety:      On or about 11/7/23, Lester Losada was not trained or qualified in electrical safety recognition so he could identify and avoid electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $6452
  • — Z (S) $6452

1926.21 B02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6452.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2):   The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:      In the Alternative:   29 CFR  1910.332(b)(2):  Employees who were not qualified persons were not trained in and familiar with any electrically related safety practices not specifically addressed by 29 CFR 1910.331 through 29 CFR 1910.335, but which were necessary for their safety:    On or about 11/7/23, Alexander Pantoja was not trained or qualified in electrical safety recognition so he could identify and avoid electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $6452
  • — Z (S) $6452

1910.333 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6452.00 · Current $6452.00
29 CFR  1926.416(a)(1):  No employer shall permit an employee to work in such proximity to any part of an electric power circuit that the employee could contact the electric power circuit in the course of work, unless the employee is protected against electric shock by deenergizing the circuit and grounding it or by guarding it effectively by insulation or other means.  In the Alternative:  29 CFR  1910.333(a):  Safety-related work practices were not employed to prevent electric shock or other injuries resulting from either direct or indirect electrical contacts, when work was performed near or on equipment or circuits which were or could be energized.      On or about 11/7/23, the employer permitted an employee to work in close proximity to an energized electric power circuit without protecting the employee from electric shock hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $6452
  • — C (S) $6452
  • — Z (S) $6452

1910.333 B02 IV B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6452.00 · Current $6452.00
29 CFR  1926.416(a)(3): Before work was begun the employer did not ascertain by inquiry or direct observation, or by instruments, whether any part of an energized electric power circuit, exposed or concealed, was so located that the performance of the work could bring any person, tool, or machine into physical or electrical contact with the electric power circuit.  The employer did not post and maintain proper warning signs where such a circuit existed.  The employer did not advise employees of the location of such lines, the hazards involved, and the protective measures to be taken:  In the Alternative:  29 CFR  1910.333(b)(2)(iv)(B):  A qualified person did not use test equipment to test the circuit elements and electrical parts of equipment to which employees will be exposed and shall verify that the circuit elements and equipment parts are deenergized:    On or about 11/7/23, the employer began work without determining if employees could contact any part of an energized circuit and did not post warning signs and advise employees of the location of the circuit, hazards, and protective measures they need to take.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $6452
  • — C (S) $6452
  • — Z (S) $6452

VERIZON

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347090045.