EAU CLAIRE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: AMBIENT INKS, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of AMBIENT INKS, LLC in 524 WATER STREET, EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703 (NAICS 323113). OSHA activity number 347483661.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AMBIENT INKS, LLC
- Site address
- 524 WATER STREET
- City
- EAU CLAIRE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54703
- Mailing
- 524 WATER STREET, EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323113
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5485.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): (a) Production; On or about May 15, 2024, and dates prior, the employer did not perform a hazard assessment to determine personal protective equipment required to be used by employees such as eye and hand protection when using various ink cleaning chemicals including, but not limited to, Plastisolv 842 and JP-53.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5485
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $2743.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: (a) Screen room; On or about May 15, 2024, and dates prior, the employer did not verify and certify that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed, including the personal protective equipment (PPE) required to be worn by employees exposed to hazardous cleaning chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2742.5
- — Z (S) $0
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6857.00 · Current $3429.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: (a) Screen room; On or about May 14, 2024, and dates prior, the employer did not ensure that an employee wore appropriate eye protection when handling/using corrosive chemicals such as Kiwo Stencil Remover 1:20 and Nutralyze.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3428.5
- — Z (S) $6857
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $11292.00 · Current $3388.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) Screen room; On or about May 14, 2024, and dates prior, a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required use of half facepiece elastomeric respirators during the screen reclaim process.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $3387.6
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) Screen room; On or about May 14, 2024, and dates prior, medical evaluations were not provided to employees required to use half facepiece elastomeric respirators during the screen reclaim process.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter: (a) Screen room; On or about May 14, 2024, and dates prior, employees required to wear tight-fitting half facepiece elastomeric respirators during the screen reclaim process were not fit tested prior to initial use and/or on an annual basis.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: (a) Screen room; On or about May 14, 2024, and dates prior, an employee required to wear a half facepiece elastomeric respirator during the screen reclaim process had facial hair where the respirator sealing surface contacts the face.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii): (a) Screen room; On or about May 14, 2024, and dates prior, the employer did not provide training for employees required to use half facepiece elastomeric respirators during the screen reclaim process prior to respirator use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $11292.00 · Current $5646.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: (a) Production; On or about May 15, 2024, and dates prior, an energy control program with procedures, employee training, and periodic inspections was not established and implemented before employees performed covered activities on the screen print press machines (big press - S. Rouge Model Roqprint You P08C06 M Serial No. RPB-1524).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5646
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4113.00 · Current $2057.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries: (a) Poster room; On or about May 15, 2024, and dates prior, a 5-pound Amerex A500 ABC dry chemical portable fire extinguisher (No. PM-924851) was sitting on the floor not mounted to provide ready access.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2056.5
- — Z (S) $4113
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): Where the employer has provided portable fire extinguishers for employee use in the workplace, an educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting: (a) Throughout the facility; On or about May 15, 2024, and dates prior, the employer did not provide training to employees on the proper utilization of portable fire extinguishers located within the facilities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $11292.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) Production; On or about May 15, 2024, and dates prior, the load/unload station of the screen print press machines (big press - S. Rogue Model Roqprint You P14 XL Serial No. RPB-1592 and little press - S. Rogue Model Roqprint You P08C06 M Serial No. RPB-1524) were not adequately guarded to protect employees from being struck by the rotating metal pallets.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $11292
More inspections at AMBIENT INKS, LLC
EAU CLAIRE, WI—2025-01-15
AMBIENT INKS, LLC
View AMBIENT INKS, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323113)
CHICAGO, IL—2026-07-08
SOARDIST USA INC. DBA SOARDIST DISPLAYS AND APPAREL
PENNOCK, MN—2026-07-06
111536 - MINNESOTA SCREEN PRINT - EMBROIDERY INC
PENNOCK, MN—2026-07-06
111528 - MINNESOTA SCREEN PRINT - EMBROIDERY INC
NORWALK, CT—2026-07-06
LAX.COM
NORFOLK, VA—2026-07-01
TEGRA GLOBAL
More inspections in WI
MUSCODA, WI—2026-07-10
SCOT INDUSTRIES, INC
FRANKLIN, WI—2026-07-10
EDGE BROADBAND SOLUTIONS LLC
APPLETON, WI—2026-07-10
LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
KIMBERLY, WI—2026-07-10
ENRIQUE RESENDIC
SLINGER, WI—2026-07-10
DYLAN MATTHEW SHELLEY LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347483661.