Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: AMBIENT INKS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of AMBIENT INKS, LLC in 524 WATER STREET, EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703 (NAICS 323113). OSHA activity number 347483661.

Watch Ambient Inks, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ambient Inks, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AMBIENT INKS, LLC
Site address
524 WATER STREET
City
EAU CLAIRE
State
WI
ZIP
54703
Mailing
524 WATER STREET, EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
323113
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5485.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1):  The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  (a) Production; On or about May 15, 2024, and dates prior, the employer did not perform a hazard assessment to determine personal protective equipment required to be used by employees such as eye and hand protection when using various ink cleaning chemicals including, but not limited to, Plastisolv 842 and JP-53.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5485

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $2743.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):  The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:   (a) Screen room; On or about May 15, 2024, and dates prior, the employer did not verify and certify that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed, including the personal protective equipment (PPE) required to be worn by employees exposed to hazardous cleaning chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2742.5
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6857.00 · Current $3429.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  (a) Screen room; On or about May 14, 2024, and dates prior, the employer did not ensure that an employee wore appropriate eye protection when handling/using corrosive chemicals such as Kiwo Stencil Remover 1:20 and Nutralyze.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3428.5
  • — Z (S) $6857

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $11292.00 · Current $3388.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) Screen room; On or about May 14, 2024, and dates prior, a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required use of half facepiece elastomeric respirators during the screen reclaim process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3387.6
  • — Z (S) $11292

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   (a) Screen room; On or about May 14, 2024, and dates prior, medical evaluations were not provided to employees required to use half facepiece elastomeric respirators during the screen reclaim process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter:   (a) Screen room; On or about May 14, 2024, and dates prior, employees required to wear tight-fitting half facepiece elastomeric respirators during the screen reclaim process were not fit tested prior to initial use and/or on an annual basis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  (a) Screen room; On or about May 14, 2024, and dates prior, an employee required to wear a half facepiece elastomeric respirator during the screen reclaim process had facial hair where the respirator sealing surface contacts the face.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii):  (a) Screen room; On or about May 14, 2024, and dates prior, the employer did not provide training for employees required to use half facepiece elastomeric respirators during the screen reclaim process prior to respirator use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $11292.00 · Current $5646.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  (a) Production; On or about May 15, 2024, and dates prior, an energy control program with procedures, employee training, and periodic inspections was not established and implemented	before employees performed covered activities on the screen print press machines (big press - S. Rouge Model Roqprint You P08C06 M Serial No. RPB-1524).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5646
  • — Z (S) $11292

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4113.00 · Current $2057.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:  (a) Poster room; On or about May 15, 2024, and dates prior, a 5-pound Amerex A500 ABC dry chemical portable fire extinguisher (No. PM-924851) was sitting on the floor not mounted to provide ready access.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2056.5
  • — Z (S) $4113

1910.157 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): Where the employer has provided portable fire extinguishers for employee use in the workplace, an educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:  (a) Throughout the facility; On or about May 15, 2024, and dates prior, the employer did not provide training to employees on the proper utilization of portable fire extinguishers located within the facilities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $11292.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  (a) Production; On or about May 15, 2024, and dates prior, the load/unload station of the screen print press machines (big press - S. Rogue Model Roqprint You P14 XL Serial No. RPB-1592 and little press - S. Rogue Model Roqprint You P08C06 M Serial No. RPB-1524) were not adequately guarded to protect employees from being struck by the rotating metal pallets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $11292

View AMBIENT INKS, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347483661.