1,224,460Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-16
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: CENTRAL NATIONAL GOTTESMAN INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CENTRAL NATIONAL GOTTESMAN INC. in 34 LONDONDERRY ROAD, LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 (NAICS 322211). OSHA activity number 347603946.

Watch Central National Gottesman INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Central National Gottesman INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
34 LONDONDERRY ROAD
City
LONDONDERRY
State
NH
ZIP
03053
Mailing
3 MANHATTANVILLE ROAD, PURCHASE, NY 10577
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
322211
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $16131.00 · Current $16131.00
29 CFR  1910.28(b)(1)(i):Except as provided elsewhere in this section 29 CFR 1910.28, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by one or more of the systems described in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i):  Warehouse- On or about July 8, an employee sustained an injury after falling approximately 6 feet from a stack of corrugated cardboard pallets and striking their head on the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $16131
  • — Z (S) $16131

1910.176 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $16131.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.176(b): Material stored in tiers was not stacked, blocked, interlocked or limited in height so that it was stable and secure against sliding and collapse:  Warehouse- On or about July 8, employees were not protected from struck by hazards where pallets of corrugated cardboard, weighing approximately 450 lbs, were stacked 4 tiers high causing the tops of lower tiers to crush and crown. The top tier pallet fell off of the stack when the employer tried to disassemble the stack because it was leaning to one side.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $16131

1910.178 M02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $16131.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(m)(2): Employee(s) stood under or passed under the elevated portion of a powered industrial truck:   Warehouse- On or about July 8, an employee working below the forks of a partially loaded Raymond 740 R35TT reach truck sustained an injury when the load fell from the forks and struck the employee.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $16131

1910.178 M05 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.178(m)(5)(iii): Powered industrial truck(s), with the operator dismounted and within 25 feet of the truck still in his view, did not have the load engaging means fully lowered:   Warehouse- On or about July 8, an employee operating a Raymond 740 R35TT reach truck sustained an injury when they dismounted the reach truck with the loaded forks elevated; the load fell from the forks and struck the employee who was under the load.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 O01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.178(o)(1): Load(s) on powered industrial truck(s) were not stable or safely arranged:   Warehouse- On or about July 8, an employee operating a Raymond 740 R35TT reach truck sustained an injury when they manually adjusted the position of the forks on the back rest and did not properly secure one of the forks. One of the forks dislodged from the back rest and dropped a pallet of corrugated cardboard onto the reach truck operator, who dismounted the truck, and was beneath the loaded forks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(2)(ii):The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.  Site- Each employee operating powered industrial trucks in the warehouse was not provided with all elements of a powered industrial truck training program including, but not limited to, formal instruction.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L03 I J

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(3)(i)(J): Training did not include vehicle inspection and maintenance that the operators are required to perform:   Site- Each employee operating powered industrial trucks in the warehouse was not provided with formal or practical training which included daily inspection procedures of the powered industrial trucks operated at the site.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined at least daily before being placed in service.   Warehouse- Powered industrial trucks were not inspected at least daily prior to being placed in service each day of use by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View CENTRAL NATIONAL GOTTESMAN INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347603946.