Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BGS HOLDINGS, LLC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BGS HOLDINGS, LLC. in 212 E HIGHWAY 66, ARCADIA, OK 73007 (NAICS 722511). OSHA activity number 348064106.

Watch BGS Holdings, LLC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BGS Holdings, LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BGS HOLDINGS, LLC.
Site address
212 E HIGHWAY 66
City
ARCADIA
State
OK
ZIP
73007
Mailing
212 E HIGHWAY 66, ARCADIA, OK 73007
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
722511
Employees
102
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $10641.00 · Current $10641.00
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fire hazards.  a.) On or about February 23, 2025, and at times prior to, within the main dining area of the restaurant, employees were exposed to fire hazards when a propane torch kit was used to light the wood of an indoor enclosed firepit; and,   b.) On or about February 25, 2025, and at times prior to, within the bar dining area of the restaurant, the employer was using multiple propane gas powered patio heaters, listed for outdoor use only, inside of the building.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $10641

1910.22 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8511.00 · Current $8511.00
29 CFR  1910.22(b): The employer did not ensure that each walking-working surface can support the maximum intended load for that surface.  On or about February 25, 2025, and at times prior to, above the kitchen in the open attic space, employees access the attic area where the walking-working surface does not support the maximum intended load.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $8511

1910.28 B11 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8511.00 · Current $8511.00
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(11)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each flight of stairs having at least 3 treads and at least 4 risers is equipped with stair rail systems and handrails as described in 29 CFR 1910.28 Table D-2-Stairway Handrail Requirements.  a.)  On or about February 25, 2025, and at times prior to, in front of the kitchen to the north wall, a stairway used by employees to access the attic, did not have hand rail or stair rail systems installed.  b.)  On or about February 25, 2025, and at times prior to, within the west side of the building near the bar area of the dining room, employees access the second floor seating area using a staircase with a stair rail system that does not have a mid-rail.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $8511

1910.110 B07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8511.00 · Current $8511.00
29 CFR  1910.110(b)(7)(i): Valves, fittings, and accessories connected directly to the container including primary shutoff valves did not have a rated working pressure of at least 250 p.s.i.g. and were not made of material and design suitable for LP-Gas service. Cast iron must not be used for container valves, fittings, and accessories. This does not prohibit the use of container valves made of malleable or nodular iron.  On or about February 25, 2025, and at times prior to, behind the southeast side of the restaurant, employees use a 1000-gallon propane tank to refill smaller portable propane tanks and this 1000-gallon propane tank had accessories that were not made of a material and design suitable for LP-Gas service.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $8511

1910.110 C06 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.110(c)(6)(v): Containers having a water capacity in excess of 50 pounds (approximately 21 pounds LP-Gas capacity), recharged at the installation, were not provided with excess flow or backflow check valves to prevent the discharge of container contents in case of failure of the filling or equalizing connection.   On or about February 25, 2025, and at times prior to, behind the southeast side of the restaurant, during bottle refilling operations employees use a 1000-gallon propane tank to refill smaller portable propane tanks and the 1000-gallon propane tank did not have an excess flow valve or a backflow check valve to prevent an uncommanded discharge of propane.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.110 B14 VI

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8511.00 · Current $8511.00
29 CFR  1910.110(b)(14)(vi): Filling of portable containers, containers mounted on skids, fuel containers on farm tractors, or similar applications, from storage containers used in domestic or commercial service, were performed less than 50 feet from the nearest important building.  On or about February 25, 2025, and at times prior to, behind the southeast side of the restaurant, a 1000-gallon storage propane tank was used to refill smaller portable propane tanks and this refilling process was located less than fifty (50) feet from a commercial building.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $8511

1910.110 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8511.00 · Current $8511.00
29 CFR 1910.110(f)(2)(i): Liquefied petroleum gas container(s) in storage were not located so as to minimize exposure to excessive temperature rise, physical damage, or tampering from unauthorized persons.  On or about February 25, 2025, and at times prior to, behind the southeast wall of the restaurant, the 1000-gallon propane storage tank, used to refill smaller propane tanks, was not protected from being struck from vehicular traffic.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $8511

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8511.00 · Current $8511.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1):The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in the following instances:  a.)  On or about February 23, 2025, and at times prior to, within the main dining area of the restaurant, employees operated a propane fueled flame torch and the hazards of this operation were not evaluated to necessitate the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).  b.)  On or about February 25, 2025, and at times prior to, at the 1000-gallon propane tank behind the restaurant's southeast wall, employees refilled portable propane tanks and the hazards of this operation were not evaluated to necessitate the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $8511

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.138(a):  The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from thermal burns and harmful temperature extremes.  a.)  On or about February 23, 2025, and at times prior to, within the main dining area of the restaurant, the employer required employees to use a propane fueled flame torch to light a firepit and the employees were not required to use hand protection.  b.)  On or about February 25, 2025, and at times prior to, at the 1000-gallon propane tank behind the restaurant's southeast wall, the employer required employees to refill portable propane tanks and were not required to use hand protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348064106.