Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SIGNATURE INDUSTRIAL SERVICES

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of SIGNATURE INDUSTRIAL SERVICES in 1795 BURT ST., BEAUMONT, TX 77704 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 339017535.

Watch Signature Industrial Services — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Signature Industrial Services is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1795 BURT ST.
City
BEAUMONT
State
TX
ZIP
77704
Mailing
9027 BLEWETT ROAD, BEAUMONT, TX 77705
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
88
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 F04

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6300.00 · Current $6300.00
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(4): The employer did not implement safe work practices for employees performing high risk maintenance activities on process equipment.        a)    On April 17, 2013 or at times prior thereto in the Catalytic Hydro-Desulfurization Unit 2 (CHD-2) at the ExxonMobil Beaumont Refinery, the employer did not ensure that the E-1 exchangers were free of all energy sources before employees began flame cutting to remove flange bolts from the channel heads.   b)    On April 17, 2013 or at times prior thereto in the Catalytic Hydro-Desulfurization Unit 2 (CHD-2) at the ExxonMobil Beaumont Refinery, the employer did not implement safe work practices for safely opening process equipment, such as but not limited to the E-1 Exchangers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6300
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.119 H03 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.119(h)(3)(ii): The contract employer did not assure that each contract employee was instructed in the known potential fire, explosion, or toxic release hazards related to his/her job and the process, and the applicable provisions of the emergency action plan.  On April 17, 2013 or at times prior thereto at the E-1 exchangers, in the Catalytic Hydro-Desulfurization Unit - 2 (CHD-2) at ExxonMobil Beaumont Refinery the contract employer did not assure that each contract employee was instructed in the known potential fire and explosion hazards of flame cutting the flange bolts on the channel heads of the E-1 exchangers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.119(h)(3)(iv): The contract employer did not assure that each contract employee followed the safety rules of the facility including the safe work practices required by paragraph (f)(4) of this section.   On April 17, 2013 or at times prior thereto in the Catalytic Hydro Desulfurization Unit 2 (CHD-2) at the ExxonMobil Beaumont Refinery the employer did not assure that each of the employees followed the safety rules of the facility including safe work practice for removing flange bolts in order to remove the channel heads of the E-1 heat exchangers that contained petroleum hydrocarbons.    a)    The employer failed to assure that the E-1 exchangers were free of all energy sources before employees began flame cutting to remove flange bolts from the channel heads.   b)    The employer failed to assure that employees implemented Maintenance Procedure 203 (MP-203) to safely open process equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 D05 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that all potentially hazardous stored or residual energy was relieved, disconnected, restrained, and otherwise rendered safe.   On April 17, 2013 or at times prior thereto at E-1 exchangers, in the Catalytic Hydrodesulfizer Unit 2 (CHD-2) at the ExxonMobil Beaumont Refinery the employer did not ensure that procedures utilized to de-inventory, and neutralize the equipment during turnaround were complete and effective to control the unexpected release of residual energy.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 J03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6300.00 · Current $6300.00
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(3): The employer did not train each employee involved in maintaining the on-going integrity of process equipment in the procedures applicable to the employee's job tasks to ensure that the employee can perform the job tasks in a safe manner:     On April 17, 2013 or at times prior thereto at E-1 exchangers, in the  Catalytic Hydrodesulfurization Unit #2 (CHD-2) of the ExxonMobil Refinery in Beaumont, Texas, the employer did not ensure that each employee was trained and aware of the applicable procedures needed for the employee's job tasks to ensure the employee could perform the job task of flame cutting bolts and opening the E-1 Exchangers in a safe manner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $6300
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.119 K02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6300.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(k)(2): The employer did not assure that the fire prevention and protection requirements in 29 CFR 1910.252(a) (specifically 1910.252(a)(2)(vi)(C) & 1910.252(a)(3)(i)) have been implemented prior to beginning the hot work operations.  On April 17, 2013 or at times prior thereto in the Catalytic Hydrodesulfurization Unit 2 (CHD-2), at the ExxonMobil Beaumont Refinery Complex, the employer did not prohibit employees from flame cutting flange bolts on the E-1 Exchangers which contained residual hydrocarbon.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6300

View SIGNATURE INDUSTRIAL SERVICES's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339017535.