2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

TUSCOLA, IL —

OSHA Inspection: GROWMARK, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GROWMARK, INC. in 1000 EAST WILSON STREET, TUSCOLA, IL 61953 (NAICS 236210). OSHA activity number 340137058.

Watch Growmark, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Growmark, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
GROWMARK, INC.
Site address
1000 EAST WILSON STREET
City
TUSCOLA
State
IL
ZIP
61953
Mailing
1701 TOWANDA AVENUE, BLOOMINGTON, IL 61702

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
236210
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

Citations

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L04 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2700.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): Employer did not provide an evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator performance, at least once every three years:   The employer did not evaluate the performance of each previously trained and certified powered industrial truck operator at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.178 L06

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph (l) and shall include the name of the operator, the date of training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation:   Each previously trained, evaluated and certified forklift operator was not evaluated prior to the expiration of their certification and the employer did not re-certify employees, documenting the operator's name, date of the training, date of the current evaluation, and the name of the person conducting the evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and  the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    Employees were exposed to a fall hazard 10 feet  6 inches when using a ladder to access the roof and the side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $4500

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6300.00 · Current $6300.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not provide frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment by a competent person:                                                                         Employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards while performing construction activities and the employer did not provide inspections of the jobsite by a competent person to ensure suitable controls were used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6300
  • — Z (S) $6300

1926.760 C03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6300.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.760(c)(3): The boundaries of a CDZ were not designated and clearly marked by the use of control lines or equivalent:     Employees were exposed to a fall hazard up to 18 feet and were not using any form of fall protection and the employer had not designated and implemented a clearly marked controlled decking zone.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6300

1926.761 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.761(b): The employer did not train each employee exposed to a fall hazard in accordance with the requirements of this section and ensure employee participation in the program:    Employees were exposed to a fall hazard up to 18 feet while installing metal roofing and employees were not provided with training while engaged in steel erection activities or the fall protection system to be used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.760 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.760(a)(1): Each employee engaged in a steel erection activity who is on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge more than 15 feet (4.6 m) above a lower level shall be protected from fall hazards by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems or fall restraint systems:    Employees were exposed to a fall hazard up to 18 feet while installing metal roofing and a suitable fall protection system was not being used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

More inspections at GROWMARK, INC.

View GROWMARK, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236210)

More inspections in IL

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340137058.