Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BIG LAKE GAS PLANT, LP

Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of BIG LAKE GAS PLANT, LP in 189 GAS PLANT ROAD, BIG LAKE, TX 76932 (NAICS 211112). OSHA activity number 343093357.

Watch BIG Lake GAS Plant, LP — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BIG Lake GAS Plant, LP is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
189 GAS PLANT ROAD
City
BIG LAKE
State
TX
ZIP
76932
Mailing
P.O. BOX 16, BARNHART, TX 76930
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
211112
Employees
16
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.120 Q06 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5174.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii): Employees who participated as hazardous materials technicians, or were expected to participate as hazardous materials technicians, had not received at least 24 hours of training equal to the first responder operations level, and in addition have competency in the areas outlined in 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii)(A) through (q)(6)(iii)(I) and/or the employer did not so certify:  On or about April 14, 2018, in the acid gas compressor area, employee(s) investigating or responding to a rescue had not received hazardous material training or equivalent training.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5174
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.120 Q03 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5174.00 · Current $10348.00
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(iv): Employees engaged in emergency response and exposed to hazardous substances presenting an inhalation hazard or potential inhalation hazard, did not wear positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus until such time that the individual in charge of the incident command system determined through the use of air monitoring that a decreased level of respiratory protection would not result in hazardous exposures to employees:    On or about April 14, 2018, the employer did not ensure employee(s) engaged in emergency response to hazardous substance such as but not limited to, hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas release wore positive pressure self-contained breathing apparatus until a decreased level of protection was determined protective through air monitoring.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $10348
  • — C (S) $5174
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.134 D02 I B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5174.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(2)(i)(B): The employer did not provide a full face piece pressure demand supplied-air respirator (SAR) with auxiliary self-contained air supply for employee use in IDLH atmospheres:    On or about April 14, 2018, in the acid gas compressor area, the employer did not require employees wear supplied-air respirators (SAR) while performing maintenance on the methanol metering pump.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5174
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5174.00 · Current $5174.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that employees acquired the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage and removal of energy control devices:    On or about April 14, 2018, in the acid gas compressor area, the employer did not provide training to employees who serviced and replaced equipment, such as the methanol metering pump.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5174
  • — C (S) $5174
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.1000 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5174.00 · Current $2587.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1000(b)(2):  Employee(s) exposure to an airborne concentration of Hydrogen Sulfide listed in Table Z-2 in excess of the peak concentration of 50 PPM:     On or about April 14, 2018, in the acid gas compressor area, employees were exposed to hydrogen sulfide above the maximum peak concentration of 50 ppm.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2587
  • — C (S) $5174
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1000(e):   Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a):     On or about April 14, 2018, the employer did not implement feasible engineering and administrative controls  to prevent employees from exposure to hydrogen sulfide (H2S).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View BIG LAKE GAS PLANT, LP's full OSHA safety record →

RNWBL

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343093357.