WEST CHESTER, OH —
OSHA Inspection: JOSHUA DITMORE
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JOSHUA DITMORE in 9452 CINCINNATI-COLUMBUS ROAD, WEST CHESTER, OH 45069 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344367032.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSHUA DITMORE
- Site address
- 9452 CINCINNATI-COLUMBUS ROAD
- City
- WEST CHESTER
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45069
- Mailing
- 293 DEER CREEK DRIVE, AMELIA, OH 45102
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $5304.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Accident prevention responsibilities. Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers. a) On or about 10/09/2019 there was no frequent and regular inspection program being maintained in use by a competent person to ensure the job site, material and equipment; such as fall protection systems and ladders.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5304
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $5304.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a) On or about 10/09/2019 employees were tearing off an old roof on a residential property. Employees were not utilizing fall protection system. The height of the fall hazard was measured at 14ft 1" from the ground.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5304
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $5304.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The following training provisions supplement and clarify the requirements of 1926.21 regarding the hazards addressed in Subpart M of this part. Training program. The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. a) On or about 10/09/2019 employees have not being trained on fall protection systems and on hazards of falls, while working on heights of 14ft 1".
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5304
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $5304.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Use. The following requirements apply to the use of all ladders, including job-made ladders, except as otherwise indicated: When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. a) On or about 10/09/2019 employees were accessing and exiting the roof by utilizing an extension ladder. The extension ladder did not extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing. The ladder was also, not secure on the top to a rigid support, leaning against the house and tilting to the left.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5304
More inspections at JOSHUA DITMORE
HAMILTON, OH—2026-06-29
JOSHUA DITMORE
CINCINNATI, OH—2026-06-24
JOSHUA DITMORE
View JOSHUA DITMORE's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
SIOUX FALLS, SD—2026-07-13
H & R ROOFING OF SOUTH DAKOTA, INC.
HENDERSON, NV—2026-07-13
INTEGRITY ROOFING LLC
CORTLANDT MANOR, NY—2026-07-13
LG BUILDERS INC.
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
BLOOMINGTON, IL—2026-07-13
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
More inspections in OH
OXFORD, OH—2026-07-13
R&R SIDING LLC
CONNEAUT, OH—2026-07-13
CONTINENTAL STRUCTURAL PLASTICS
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
HARRISON, OH—2026-07-10
WEBER FAMILY FARMS LLC
JEFFERSON, OH—2026-07-10
LAKE CITY PLATING LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344367032.