1,224,460Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-16
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: CESYL MILLS, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CESYL MILLS, INC. in 1 PRIVILEGE STREET, WOONSOCKET, RI 02895 (NAICS 313240). OSHA activity number 344376629.

Watch Cesyl Mills, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cesyl Mills, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CESYL MILLS, INC.
Site address
1 PRIVILEGE STREET
City
WOONSOCKET
State
RI
ZIP
02895
Mailing
95 WEST MAIN STREET, MILLBURY, MA 01527
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
313240
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 B09

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4376.00 · Current $3063.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(b)(9): Ladders were not inspected before the initial use in each work shift, or more frequently as necessary, to identify any visible defects that could cause injury.:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 10/15/2019, the employer did not ensure that the ladder on the Karl Mayer Knitting Machine was properly inspected to identify defects such as the ladder handrail not being fully secured from movement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3063.2
  • — Z (S) $4376

1910.23 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(1): The employer did not ensure fixed ladders were capable of supporting their maximum intended load:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 10/15/2019, the employer did not ensure that the ladder handrail on the Karl Mayer Knitting Machine was properly attached to the ladder, and could support the maximum intended load.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.23 D04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(4): The side rails of through or sidestep ladders did not extend 42 inches (1.1 m) above the top of the access level or landing platform served by the ladder:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 10/15/2019, the employer did not ensure that the ladder side rails or handrails on the Karl Mayer Knitting Machine extended 42 inches above the upper landing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.25 B07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3126.00 · Current $2188.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.25(b)(7): Standard stairs which are used to provide access from one walking-working surface to another when operations necessitate regular and routine travel between levels, including access to operating platforms for equipment were not utilized:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 10/15/2019, the employer did not provide standard stairs to the upper working platform of the Karl Mayer Knitting Machine that employees routinely access to perform their job duties.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2188.2
  • — Z (S) $3126

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4376.00 · Current $3063.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by one or more of the following: Guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 10/15/2019, the employer did not ensure that employees working on the upper platform of the Karl Mayer Knitting Machine were protected from fall hazards of approximately 7.5 feet on either end of the platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3063.2
  • — Z (S) $4376

1910.147 C07 I B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3126.00 · Current $2188.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 10/15/2019, the employer did not ensure that machine operators that are affected by Lockout/Tag-out were instructed in the energy control procedure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2188.2
  • — Z (S) $3126

View CESYL MILLS, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344376629.