GAINESVILLE, GA —
OSHA Inspection: FOUNDATION FOOD GROUP, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FOUNDATION FOOD GROUP, INC. in 2076 MEMORIAL PARK DRIVE, GAINESVILLE, GA 30501 (NAICS 311615). OSHA activity number 345267124.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FOUNDATION FOOD GROUP, INC.
- Site address
- 2076 MEMORIAL PARK DRIVE
- City
- GAINESVILLE
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30501
- Mailing
- 2093 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, GAINESVILLE, GA 30504
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311615
- Employees
- 170
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 G05 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $10728.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(ii): Where mobile test vans were used to meet the audiometric testing obligation, the employer did not obtain a valid baseline audiogram within 1 year of an employee's first exposure at or above the action level: a) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive a baseline audiogram within one year of the employee's first exposure. Noise sampling performed on an employee working at line 2 platform resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 93.4 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 604 minutes. b) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive a baseline audiogram within one year of the employee's first exposure. Noise sampling performed on an employee working on line 1 ready to eat (RTE) resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 91.1 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 559 minutes. c) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive a baseline audiogram within one year of the employee's first exposure. Noise sampling performed on an employee working at the platform on line 2 separating chicken on the conveyor resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 91.9 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 588 minutes. d) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive a baseline audiogram within one year of the employee's first exposure. Noise sampling performed on an employee working at the on line 3 marination resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 91 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 572 minutes. e) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive a baseline audiogram within one year of the employee's first exposure. Noise sampling performed on an employee working on line 3 marination resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 88.1 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 568 minutes. f) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive a baseline audiogram within one year of the employee's first exposure. Noise sampling performed on an employee working in line 2 bagging area resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 89.9 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 558 minutes. g) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive a baseline audiogram within one year of the employee's first exposure. Noise sampling performed on an employee working at the platform on line 2 and line 1 in RTE resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 87.0 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 557 minutes.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5000
- — C (S) $10728
- — Z (S) $10728
1910.95 G06
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(6): At least annually after obtaining the baseline audiogram, the employer did not obtain a new audiogram for each employee exposed at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: a) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive an audiogram at least annually after obtaining the baseline audiogram. Noise sampling performed on an employee working on line 3 marination resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 89.3 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 605 minutes. b) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive an audiogram at least annually after obtaining the baseline audiogram. Noise sampling performed on an employee working on line 3 marination resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 89.2 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 574 minutes.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 K02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $10728.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(2): The training program was not repeated annually for each employee included in the hearing conservation program: a) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive training annually. Noise sampling performed on an employee working on line 3 marination resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 89.3 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 605 minutes. b) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive training annually. Noise sampling performed on an employee working on line 3 marination resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 89.2 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 574 minutes. c) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive training annually. Noise sampling performed on an employee working on line 2 packing area resulted in noise levels of 89.9 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 235 minutes which represents employee's 10 hours work day. d) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive training annually. Noise sampling performed on an employee operating the tumbler on line 1 marination room resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 87.4 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 447 minutes.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5000
- — C (S) $10728
- — Z (S) $10728
1910.95 K03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(3): The employer did not ensure that each employee exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time weighted average of 85 decibels was trained and informed of the information included in sections k(3)(i) through k(3)(iii). a) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive adequate training. Noise sampling performed on an employee working at the platform on line 2 platform resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 93.4 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 604 minutes. b) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive adequate training. Noise sampling performed on an employee working on line 1 ready to eat (RTE) resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 91.1 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 559 minutes. c) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive adequate training. Noise sampling performed on an employee working at the platform on line 2 separating chicken on the conveyor resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 91.9 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 588 minutes. d) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive adequate training. Noise sampling performed on an employee working on line 3 marination resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 91 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 572 minutes. e) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive adequate training. Noise sampling performed on an employee working on line 3 marination resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 88.1 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 568 minutes. f) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive adequate training. Noise sampling performed on an employee working in line 2 bagging area resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 89.9 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 558 minutes. g) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive adequate training. Noise sampling performed on an employee working at the platform on line 2 and line 1 RTE resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 87.0 dBA which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 557 minutes. h) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive adequate training. Noise sampling performed on an employee operating the bagger on line 2 resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 89.8 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 601 minutes. i) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive adequate training. Noise sampling performed on an employee working on line 3 bagging/packing area resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 91.3 dBA which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 596 minutes. j) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive adequate training. Noise sampling performed on an employee working on line 2 batter station resulted in noise levels of 91.0 dBA which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 235 minutes which represents the employee's 10 hours work day. k) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive adequate training. Noise sampling performed on an employee working on line 2 separating chicken on the conveyor resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 93.4 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 605 minutes. l) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive adequate training. Noise sampling performed on an employee working on line 3 marination resulted in noise levels of 87.7 dBA which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 219 minutes which represents the employee's 10 hours work day. m) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive adequate training. Noise sampling performed on an employee working on line 3 packing area resulted in noise levels of 88.2 dBA which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 250 minutes which represents the employee's 10 hours work day. n) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive adequate training. Noise sampling performed on an employee operating the bagger on line 1 RTE resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 88.9 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 332 minutes. o) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive adequate training. Noise sampling performed on an employee adding flour on line 2 resulted in noise levels at a time-weighted average (TWA) of 93.9 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 607 minutes. p) On or about June 4, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level did not receive adequate training. Noise sampling performed on an employee working on line 3 bagging/packing area resulted in noise levels of 88.7 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA. The exposure was derived from a sample taken over 212 minutes which represents the employee's 10 hours work day.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 I03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $10728.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(3): Employees were not given the opportunity to select their hearing protectors from a variety of suitable hearing protectors provided by the employer: a) On or about June 10, 2021 at Plant 4 - employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level were only provided one type of hearing protection. Noise sampling performed on employees working in the production areas resulted in noise levels at a 10-hour time-weighted average (TWA) between 87.0-93.4 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5000
- — C (S) $10728
- — Z (S) $10728
1910.95 L01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(l)(1): The employer did not make available to affected employees or their representatives copies of 29 CFR 1910.95 and did not post a copy in the workplace: a) On or about June 10, 2021 at Plant 4 - a copy of the standard was not posted for employees exposed to noise above the 10-hour action level. Noise sampling performed on employees working in the production areas resulted in noise levels at a 10-hour time-weighted average (TWA) between 87.0-93.4 dBA, which exceeded the 10-hour action level of 83.4 dBA.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at FOUNDATION FOOD GROUP, INC.
GAINESVILLE, GA—2021-03-12 00:00:00
FOUNDATION FOOD GROUP, INC.
GAINESVILLE, GA—2021-01-28 00:00:00
FOUNDATION FOOD GROUP, INC.
GAINESVILLE, GA—2020-12-10 00:00:00
FOUNDATION FOOD GROUP, INC.
View FOUNDATION FOOD GROUP, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311615)
LEWISTON WOODVILLE, NC—2026-07-10
161527 - PERDUE FARMS INC
TIMBERVILLE, VA—2026-07-08
PILGRIMS PRIDE CORPORATION
WYOMING, MI—2026-07-06
MICHIGAN TURKEY PRODUCERS
COLD SPRING, MN—2026-06-25
111475 - PILGRIMS PRIDE CORPORATION
FRESNO, CA—2026-06-22
FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, LLC
More inspections in GA
ROME, GA—2026-07-13
CAMP INDUSTRIES
SOUTH FULTON, GA—2026-07-10
REEDWICK, LLC
CONYERS, GA—2026-07-10
GOLDEN STATE FOODS
DALTON, GA—2026-07-10
ENGINEERED FLOORS, LLC
METTER, GA—2026-07-10
M.A.P.C CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345267124.