Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: REX LUMBER, TROY, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of REX LUMBER, TROY, LLC in 1946 COUNTY ROAD 7714, TROY, AL 36081 (NAICS 321113). OSHA activity number 345728273.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch REX Lumber, Troy, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for REX Lumber, Troy, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1946 COUNTY ROAD 7714
City
TROY
State
AL
ZIP
36081
Mailing
P. O. BOX 7, GRACEVILLE, FL 32440
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321113
Employees
174
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2022
Abate by
Jul 13, 2022
Penalty
Initial $11,396 · Current $6,523 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to stuck-by and crush-by hazards:   a) Warehouse (Orange/Green Rack System): On or about January 11, 2022, and at times prior thereto the employer failed to anchor and bolt down storage racks to prevent employees from exposure to struck-by and/or crush hazards when working near storage racks. Additionally, the employer failed to ensure that a placard indicating the storage racks maximum loading capacity was conspicuously displayed on the racks to ensure the rack wouldn't become overloaded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6523
  • — Z (S) $11396

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2022
Abate by
Jul 13, 2022
Penalty
Initial $9,116 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i):  Except as provided elsewhere in this section 29 CFR 1910.28, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by one or more of the systems described in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i):  a) Production  Yard Area (Mechanic Shop): On or about January 11, 2022, and times prior; the employer required employees to perform storage operations without fall protection on an elevated platform with an unprotected edge; exposing employees to fall hazards up to approximately ten feet (10') to the concrete floor below.  b) Production Yard Area (File Room): On or about January 11, 2022, and times prior; the employer required employees to perform shipping/receiving operations without fall protection on an elevated platform with an unprotected edge; exposing employees to fall hazards up to approximately fifteen feet (15') to the concrete ground below.  c) Warehouse Area (Grey Rack System): On or about January 11, 2022, and times prior; the employer required employees to perform rack storage operations without fall protection at the end of the second level storage area with an unprotected edge; exposing employees to fall hazards up to approximately seven feet (7') to the concrete floor below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $9116

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2022
Abate by
Jul 13, 2022
Penalty
Initial $9,116 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  a) Production Yard Area (Facility - Troy, AL): On or about January 11, 2022, and times prior, the employer failed to ensure forklift operators successfully completed site specific forklift training and evaluation; exposing employees to struck-by hazards during forklift operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $9116

1910.178 P01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2022
Abate by
Jul 13, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition:  a) Production Yard Area (Facility - Troy, AL): On or about January 11, 2022, and times prior, the employer failed to take out of service a Hyundai Forklift Truck  (Yellow) Model: 180D-9B, Equip.#: 88 and required employees to perform forklift operations while the forklift  was in need of repairs such as but not limited to cracked forks, low tire pressure and damaged tires with the metal cords showing; exposing employees to struck-by hazards during forklift operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2022
Abate by
Jul 13, 2022
Penalty
Initial $22,792 · Current $22,792
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  a)  Planer Mill Area (In-Feed Area): On or about January 11, 2022, and at times prior, the employer failed to ensure employees utilized the hazardous energy control procedure when employees were engaged in servicing and maintenance activities, including but not limited to clearing lumber jams in and around the pressure and pineapple rolls at the infeed conveyor system; exposing employees to caught-in and struck-by hazards.  The Rex Lumber, Graceville LLC DBA (Doing Business As) Rex Lumber was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(i), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1514664, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on March 29, 2022, with respect to a workplace located at 5299 Alabama Street Graceville, FL 32440.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $22792
  • — Z (R) $22792

View REX Lumber, Troy, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345728273.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.