Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SIGMA CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SIGMA CORPORATION in 5000 ASKINS LANE, HOUSTON, TX 77093 (NAICS 332996). OSHA activity number 347401457.

Watch Sigma Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sigma Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SIGMA CORPORATION
Site address
5000 ASKINS LANE
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77093
Mailing
5000 ASKINS LANE, HOUSTON, TX 77093
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332996
Employees
32
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 H12

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $11524.00 · Current $8643.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.107(h)(12):All areas used for spraying, including the interior of the booth, were not protected by automatic sprinklers where this protection is available. Where this protection is not available, other approved automatic extinguishing equipment were not provided:  a.  On or about April 9, 2024, an employee was exposed to a fire hazard while painting equipment in a spray booth, on the west side of the paint area, that did not have automatic sprinklers or other approved automatic extinguishing equipment.  b.  On or about March 11, 2024, an employee was exposed to a fire hazard while painting equipment in a spray booth, in the middle of the paint area, that did not have automatic sprinklers or other approved automatic extinguishing equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8643
  • — Z (S) $11524

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $11524.00 · Current $8643.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a. On or about April 9, 2024, an employee was exposed to respiratory hazards while wearing a half-facepiece and full-facepiece respirator and coating products without having been medically evaluated.  b. On or about April 9, 2024, an employee was exposed to respiratory hazards while wearing a supplied-air respirator and abrasive blasting products without having been medically evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8643
  • — Z (S) $11524

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about April 9, 2024, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards while wearing a half-facepiece and full-facepiece respirators without having been fit tested�prior to�initial use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 I07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $11524.00 · Current $8643.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(i)(7):Oil lubricated compressor(s) used to supply breathing air did not have a high-temperature or carbon monoxide alarm(s) or both:  On or about April 9, 2024, an abrasive blasting employee was exposed to respiratory hazards when employer did not maintain calibration for the carbon monoxide alarm for the supplied breathing air from an oil lubricated compressor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8643
  • — Z (S) $11524

1910.134 K01 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $11524.00 · Current $8643.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(k)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of why the respirator was necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance could compromise the protective effect of the respirator:  On or about April 9, 2024, an employee was exposed to respiratory hazards when using a supplied-air respirator while abrasive blasting and was not provided training on the respirator including its use and procedures for maintenance.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $8643
  • — Z (S) $11524

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 32 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $11524.00 · Current $8643.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(i):The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  On or about April 9, 2024, in the powder coating area and the paint area, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard when forklift drivers were not trained and evaluated on safe operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $8643
  • — Z (S) $11524

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 32 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $11524.00 · Current $8643.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(p)(1):Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):  a. On or about April 9, 2024, in the powder coating area, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when a Nissan forklift with a missing taillight was not taken out service.  b. On or about April 9, 2024, in the powder coating area, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when a Toyota forklift with broken taillights was not taken out service.  c. On or about April 9, 2024, near the abrasive blasting area, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when a Nissan forklift with a missing taillight was not taken out service.  d. On or about April 9, 2024, near the paint area, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when a Nissan forklift with broken taillights was not taken out service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8643
  • — Z (S) $11524

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9218.00 · Current $6914.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1):Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about April 9, 2024, employees were exposed to chemical hazards while working with or around hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to, Tnemec N140-0140B Pota-Pox Plus and Tnemec 1 Omnithane, before being provided effective training and information on the hazards of the chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $6913.5
  • — Z (S) $9218

1910.107 B05 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.107(b)(5)(i):There were no visible gauges, audible alarms or pressure activated devices installed in paint spray booths to indicate or ensure that the required air speed was maintained.  a. On or about April 9, 2024, on the west side of the spray area, a spray booth did not have a functioning pressure gauge.  b. On or about April 9, 2024, in the middle of the spray area, a spray booth did not have a functioning pressure gauge.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 I05 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(i)(5)(iv):The employer did not ensure that the person authorized to perform the necessary sorbent bed and filter changes filled out a tag indicating by the signature and date that maintenance changes were performed:  On or about April 9, 2024, the employer did not maintain a tag indicating the most recent change date for the in-line filter and the signature of the person who performed the change.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 A06

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.178(a)(6):The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place:  a.  On or about April 9, 2024, in the abrasive blasting area, a Nissan forklift did not have a nameplate.  b.  On or about April 9, 2024, in the paint area, a Nissan forklift did not have a legible nameplate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View SIGMA CORPORATION's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347401457.