Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: TRAFA PHARMACEUTICAL INC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TRAFA PHARMACEUTICAL INC in 140 PADGETTE STREET, CHICOPEE, MA 01022 (NAICS 325412). OSHA activity number 347471690.

Watch Trafa Pharmaceutical INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Trafa Pharmaceutical INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
140 PADGETTE STREET
City
CHICOPEE
State
MA
ZIP
01022
Mailing
140 PADGETTE STREET, CHICOPEE, MA 01022
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325412
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3687.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program (RPP) that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented where respirators were necessary to protect the health of employees:  In the mixing station at 140 Padgette Street, MA:   On and before May 9, 2024, the employer did not implement a RPP for employees who are required to wear half-face elastomeric respirators while grinding and mixing organic vitamins and minerals.  ABATEMENT NOTE:  A respirator program shall include the following elements:    -Procedures for selecting respirators  -Medical evaluations for employees required to use respirators  -Procedures for fit testing tight fitting respirators  -Procedures for proper use of respirators  -Procedures and schedules for cleaning, storing, inspecting, and maintaining respirators  -Training of employees about respiratory hazards in the workplace  -Training on proper use of respirators  -Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program  *Abatement notes are intended only to provide clarity regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies. Abatement notes do not create (or diminish) legal obligations under the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3687

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer shall identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; this evaluation shall include a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazard(s) and an identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form. Where the employer cannot identify or reasonably estimate the employee exposure, the employer shall consider the atmosphere to be IDLH.  At the mixing station at 140 Padgette Street, MA:   On and before May 9, 2024, the employer did not identify, and evaluate, nuisance dust as a respirable hazard in any form, during the mixing and grinding process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  In the mixing station at 140 Padgette Street, MA:   On and before May 9, 2024, two employees were not provided a medical evaluation prior to being required to wear an elastomeric half face respirators to conduct mixing and grinding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9130

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) as stated in this paragraph.  In the mixing station at 140 Padgette Street, MA:   On and before May 9, 2024, the employer did not ensure that two employees where quantitatively or qualitatively fit-tested for respirators prior to usage for mixing and grinding of pure organic chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9130

29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  140 Padgette Street. Chicopee, MA: On March 7, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that employees, required to use respirators, did not have facial hair which came between the sealing surface of a half-face elastomeric respirator while performing mixing/grinding of pure organic ingredients.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3687.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1560

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met:  In the mixing room and at stations in the warehouse at 140 Padgette Street, MA:   On and before May 9, 2024, the employer did not develop a written HAZCOM program for various hazardous chemicals including but not limited to 70% and 99% isopropyl alcohol.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3687

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1560

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet.  In the mixing room and at stations in the warehouse at 140 Padgette Street, MA:   On and before May 9, 2024, the employer did not compile a list of hazardous chemicals known to be present such as, but not limited to, 70% and 99% isopropyl alcohol.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F06

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1560

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information specified under paragraphs (f)(6)(i) through (ii):  In the mixing room and at stations in the warehouse at 140 Padgette Street, MA: On May 9, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that secondary containers for chemicals are labeled according to the universal classification and labeling requirements.  Isopropyl alcohol was stored in unmarked spray bottles at various stations within the warehouse.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1560

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets (SDS) for each hazardous chemical and shall ensure that they are readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they are in their work area(s).  In the mixing room and at stations in the warehouse at 140 Padgette Street, MA:   On and before May 9, 2024, the employer did not ensure that SDS's are made available to employees who use hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, 99% isopropyl alcohol and bleach during the respirator sanitation and facility maintenance cleaning process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1)(i): Respirators issued for the exclusive use of an employee were not cleaned and disinfected as often as necessary to be maintained in a sanitary condition:   At 140 Padgette Street, MA:   On and before May 9, 2024, the employer did not ensure that required-use respirators are maintained in a sanitary condition.   Two respirators were observed in the mixing area and on a desk and the respirators were damaged and in unsanitary condition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 J

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9130

29 CFR 1910.134(j): The employer did not ensure all respirator filters, cartridges and canisters used in the workplace were labeled and color coded with the NIOSH approval label and that the label was not removed and was legible:  At 140 Padgette Street, MA:   On and before May 9, 2024, the employer did not ensure that required-use respirator filter cartridge labeling was legible.  An unknown half-face respirator and unknown brown cartridge filter was used that contained Chinese lettering without an expiration date.  A 3M half-face elastomeric respirator was used with filter cartridges containing damaged labeling.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View TRAFA PHARMACEUTICAL INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347471690.