Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: SHAVER TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SHAVER TRANSPORTATION COMPANY in 4900 N.W. FRONT AVE, PORTLAND, OR 97210 (NAICS 336611). OSHA activity number 342424868.

Watch Shaver Transportation Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Shaver Transportation Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4900 N.W. FRONT AVE
City
PORTLAND
State
OR
ZIP
97210
Mailing
4900 N.W. FRONT AVE, PORTLAND, OR 97210
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336611
Employees
125
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1915.115 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4889.00 · Current $4889.00
29 CFR 1915.115(a)(1): When used to transfer materials or equipment from or to a vessel, cranes which are placed onboard barges, other vessels, or on wingwalls of floating drydocks, were not tested and certified in accordance with the standards provided in 29 CFR 1919 of Hoisting and Hauling Equipment by accredited persons.    Aft working barge:  On or about June 8, 2017 and times prior thereto, the derrick mounted on the stern of the barge did not have an inspection performed by an accredited agency able to perform the inspection under the 1919 standards.  This exposed employees to struck-by hazards from potential defects with the derrick.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $4889
  • — Z (S) $4889

1910.181 J02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.181(j)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that a safety latch type hook was used whenever possible.    Derrick aft barge:  On or about June 8, 2017 and times prior thereto, the safety latch was bent and did not work as a safety latch.  This exposed employees to struck-by hazards if the load disengaged from the hook.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1915.112 C02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1915.112(c)(2): Thorough chain inspections were not conducted every three months.    Work shops:  On or about June 8, 2017 and times prior thereto, lifting chain inspections were not being completed every three months.  This exposed employees to struck-by hazards from using a chain that may have a defect.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(1): The employer shall be responsible for the inspection, maintenance and testing of all portable fire extinguishers in the workplace:  Work shops:  On or about June 8, 2017 and times prior thereto, portable fire extinguishers were not being inspected every 30 days.  This exposed employees to smoke inhalation hazards from delays in fighting a fire if needed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(iii): The employer did not provide information to the employees as to the location and availability of the written hazard communication program, and safety data sheets required by 29 CFR 1910.1200:  Shaver Transportation:  On or about June 8, 2017 and times prior thereto, the employer did not have the written portion of the Global Harmonization System.  This exposed employees to different hazards from not understanding all the requirements of the new safety data sheets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1915.89 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1915.89(b):   The employers program did not cover procedures for lockout/tags-plus systems while servicing machinery, equipment, or systems.  Shaver:  On or about June 8, 2017 and times prior thereto, the employer did not have a locks tag plus system when performing shipyard work activities.  This exposed employees to potential hazards from not following the procedures under the locks tag plus system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1915.504 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1915.504(a)(1): The employer did not create or keep a current written policy that specified the training employees must be given for employees performing fire watch in the workplace.  Shaver Transportation:  On or about June 8, 2017 and times prior thereto, The employer did not have a complete fire watch program available to employees.  This exposed employees to smoke inhalation hazards from not evaluating the need for a fire watch during hot work operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1915.504 B03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1915.504(b)(3): The employer did not post a fire watch when there was combustible material less than 35 feet in either the horizontal or vertical direction that could not be removed, was not protected with flame-proof covers or shielded with metal fire-resistant guards or curtains.  Shaver work shop:  On or about June 8, 2017 and times prior thereto, there was no fire watch posted when employees were grinding and cutting with a torch and there were combustibles within 10 feet of the operation.  This exposed employees to smoke inhalation hazards from delays in fighting a potential fire.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View SHAVER TRANSPORTATION COMPANY's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342424868.